Nice planning. How are you calculating your ratios and such? FS supplying the 
splitter?

Jon Langeler
Michwave Technologies, Inc.


> On Feb 14, 2018, at 10:50 PM, Chris Fabien <ch...@lakenetmi.com> wrote:
> 
> Yes, i think its a beautiful fit for lower density rural where you have long 
> linear roads. We do have some areas with 5 or less houses per mile too. 
> 
> The first splitter is a 1x2 FBT (fused biconal taper) those can be made in 
> any split ratio I think they vary the angle that the fibers meet. They are 
> common offered in "windowed" version that only pass typical GPON wavelengths, 
> but we custom ordered full bandwidth ones for future 10G PON techs.
> 
> Then the output of that FBT can go right to a drop or to a second "normal" 
> PLC splitter to serve multiple drops. 
> 
> We did about 12 miles with this method this year, maybe 80 or so handhole 
> with this splitter method, end of the run is about 10 miles from the cabinet. 
> 
>> On Feb 14, 2018 8:26 PM, "Adam Moffett" <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yup that's a thing.  That was actually my plan "A", except where he's got 
>> 30-40 houses in 2 miles I've got 5-10.  
>> 
>> I think PLC splitters are always even, and the other type which I can't 
>> remember the name of can be uneven.  
>> In coax they call that a "tap", but in fiber it's called a "coupler", and 
>> the thing everybody is calling a coupler is a "mating sleeve".
>> 
>> 
>> ------ Original Message ------
>> From: "Jason McKemie" <j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com>
>> To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
>> Sent: 2/14/2018 7:24:29 PM
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Outdoor PON OLT
>> 
>>> Interesting, so you have splitters that divide light unevenly? Or am I 
>>> misunderstanding you? 
>>> 
>>> On another note, I wonder if anyone has compared the ZTE GPON stuff with 
>>> Ubiquiti's offering...
>>> 
>>> On Tuesday, February 13, 2018, Chris Fabien <ch...@lakenetmi.com> wrote:
>>>> We splice in a uneven ratio 1x2 feeding a 1xN PLC to fees drops at that 
>>>> splice point. So it might look like a 10/90 with the 10% into the 1x4 and 
>>>> 90% continuing down the road on the same strand. Troubleshooting can be 
>>>> tricky, we test light as we splice to verify everything.  The benefit is I 
>>>> can pass 2 miles of road, 30-40 houses using one strand on a 12ct mainline 
>>>> and still have 11 unused strands at the end to keep going.
>>>> 
>>>> On Feb 13, 2018 4:01 PM, "Jason McKemie" 
>>>> <j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote:
>>>> Tapped trunk, meaning you use 1x2 splitters at each drop? I've been 
>>>> considering doing this, but troubleshooting, should any problem(s) arise, 
>>>> seems like a nightmare.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Tuesday, February 13, 2018, Chris Fabien <ch...@lakenetmi.com> wrote:
>>>>> With some very appreciated help from Gerard myself and another Michigan 
>>>>> ISP have deployed this ZTE equipment and Gerards description is accurate. 
>>>>> The only issue we have found is some Wi-Fi bugs in the F660 ONU we went 
>>>>> with, if you require a customer owned router or provide a different 
>>>>> router that solves the problem.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Our long term plan for that is to switch to a SmartRG GPON res gateway 
>>>>> when they are available in a couple months. All in one unit with 4x4 AC 
>>>>> wifi and voip.
>>>>> 
>>>>> We also deployed a tapped trunk splitting layout which has saved us a lot 
>>>>> of money on strand count in our low density rural areas.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Feb 12, 2018 5:58 PM, "Gerard Dupont" <ger...@shelbybb.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Chuck,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Yeah, We have 6 OLT's and a few hundred ONU's online. I know of several 
>>>>>> other operators using the same setup now too. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> It's stable and just works. The OLT hardware feels solid and quality 
>>>>>> made unlike some of the other 1U OLT's we've tried. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> You can even get an outdoor cabinet made for them for about $1500 
>>>>>> shipped. I can't find the ZTE link right now, but it is very similar to 
>>>>>> this Huawei version. 
>>>>>> https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Original-Huawei-MA5608T-ZTE-C320-Outdoors_60442562681.html?spm=a2700.7724838.2017115.1.2d7a50d9frcsQx
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Gerard
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 4:51 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> That is some scary Bernie Madoff type of pricing. 
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> You are using this now?
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> From: Gerard Dupont
>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 2:28 PM
>>>>>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Outdoor PON OLT
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> Here's some pricing based on Chinese ZTE with no real support.
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> ZTE F601 Indoor ONU 1 GE port. $24 
>>>>>>> http://sweetplaza.com/zte-gpon-terminal-ont-zxa10-f601-or-zxhn-f601-ftth-or-ftto-gpon-onu-with-one-ethernet-port-smaller-size_p1013.html
>>>>>>> ZTE F623 Indoor ONU 1GE 3FE 1POTS $29 
>>>>>>> http://sweetplaza.com/sc-apc-original-zte-zxhn-f623-gpon-onu-1ge-3fe-lan-ports-1voice-port-wifienglish-interface_p1206.html
>>>>>>> Chinese Splice on connector $0.80 http://sweetplaza.com/c/connector_0391
>>>>>>> 30M Armored simplex pigtail $9.66 from FS 
>>>>>>> https://www.fs.com/products/20745.html
>>>>>>> 20M $7.66
>>>>>>> 10M $5.66
>>>>>>> Wall Mount MultiLink/Tii Outdoor NID - $15 (I don't have link)
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> ZTE C320 OLT 16 ports of gpon with class c+ optics. $2200 
>>>>>>> $2200/16/32=$4.30/per customer at 100% utilization..
>>>>>>> Add another 16 ports with optics for only $590. that's 32*32=1024 
>>>>>>> customers potentially. $2.75/per customer at 100% util.
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> 32 port rackmount splitter. $84 https://www.fs.com/products/11948.html
>>>>>>> 32 port bare splitter for splice case $14 
>>>>>>> https://www.fs.com/products/11528.html
>>>>>>> 8 port bare splitter for splice case $5
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> None of that includes shipping or import duties/fees. So figure in a 
>>>>>>> few hundred $$$ for shipping/import fees.
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> Even if you only put 8 people per OLT port that's $2800/32/8=$11 per 
>>>>>>> customer. + $1 per port on a 1x8 PLC + $15 for NID + $29 for ONT with 
>>>>>>> POTS + $10 for 30M pigtail. = ~$65/customer all in for gpon with 8 
>>>>>>> customers per port.
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> You can use www.SmartOLT.com for web based OLT/ONU 
>>>>>>> management/monitoring (tell Adrian I sent you for a discount)
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> I prefer using GPON for the management capabilities. You can always 
>>>>>>> overlay 10GPON on top of your regular GPON network when the time comes 
>>>>>>> to upgrade. Just add/change the card in the OLT and add a 2x1 splitter 
>>>>>>> to combine both OLT ports into the single fiber. Since they use 
>>>>>>> different wavelengths they will coexist over the same fiber. Just 
>>>>>>> install new ONT's.
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> Gerard
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 2:32 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ONT Housing (Clam Shell)        $           29.00
>>>>>>>> ONT     $         215.00
>>>>>>>> Unicam  $           15.00
>>>>>>>> Cyber Power     $           81.00
>>>>>>>> Cyber Install   $         110.00
>>>>>>>> House Sub Total         $         450.00
>>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>>> OLT $11K/8/32   $           42.97
>>>>>>>> OIM $845/32     $           38.27
>>>>>>>> Splitter $900/32        $           39.43
>>>>>>>> DLC per Sub Subtotal    $         120.67
>>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>>> Electronics/Sub Total Expense   $         570.67
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>> From: Mark - Myakka Technologies
>>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 12:29 PM
>>>>>>>> To: Chuck McCown
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Outdoor PON OLT
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>> Chuck,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Dug up some of my costs on the GPON.  One port with a C+ class laser 
>>>>>>>> and a 1x32 splitter cost me about $1000.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> So if I stick with my 50% utilization numbers, that gets me about $62 
>>>>>>>> per user.  Plus an indoor ONT gets me about $200-$225 per customer for 
>>>>>>>> electronics.  As I increase my utilization, the numbers get better.  
>>>>>>>> But, we are only talking a different in a few months on the ROI.  
>>>>>>>> Remember we are debating fiber.  I have ONT's out there over 72 months 
>>>>>>>> old.  I'm sure Chuck has some at least 2 or 3 years older than that.  
>>>>>>>> I don't plan on any type of major upgrade for several years.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> But I must stress there is no right answer.  AE vs GPON.  You need to 
>>>>>>>> make sure you fully understand both options before making a decision.  
>>>>>>>> Not to mention, you can run both.  We are setup to do AE,  We 
>>>>>>>> currently have 2 customers on the AE side for various reasons vs 2500 
>>>>>>>> on the GPON side.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>> Mark                            mailto:m...@mailmt.com
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Myakka Technologies, Inc.
>>>>>>>> www.MyakkaTech.com
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ------
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Monday, February 12, 2018, 1:13:18 PM, you wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> When doing full throttle Calix GPON we have about $570 invested in cpe 
>>>>>>>> electronics, splitter, ont/olt/onu etc.  Everything but fiber and 
>>>>>>>> outdoor cabinets.  
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> When doing active Ethernet you can come in closer to $100 per 
>>>>>>>> customer.  
>>>>>>>> For non regulated greenfield, I am having a hard time convincing 
>>>>>>>> myself to do PON.  
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> From: Mark - Myakka Technologies
>>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 11:09 AM
>>>>>>>> To: Chuck McCown
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Outdoor PON OLT
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Chuck,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> PLC splitter in spice case doing full fusion splicing.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>> Mark                            mailto:m...@mailmt.com
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Myakka Technologies, Inc.
>>>>>>>> www.MyakkaTech.com
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ------
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Monday, February 12, 2018, 12:09:32 PM, you wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Are you using splitters in splice cases or in cross connect boxes?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> From: Mark - Myakka Technologies
>>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 9:55 AM
>>>>>>>> To: Adam Moffett
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Outdoor PON OLT
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Adam,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> There are some ranging things you have to consider.  "The requirement
>>>>>>>> when deploying ONTs are the maximum distance between two ONTs cannot
>>>>>>>> exceed 20Km."
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The way we have done this is to reuse fibers as we travel down long 
>>>>>>>> stretches of roads between neighborhoods.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> We will deploy a 1x32 splitter in the field. We will splice that into 
>>>>>>>> the last 3 ribbons/tubes of our fiber.  Example, if we were using a 
>>>>>>>> 144 count cable, ribbons 10-12 will be spliced into.  After a few 
>>>>>>>> miles depending on density or distance, we will splice in another 1x32 
>>>>>>>> splitter to ribbons 10-12.  We just keep doing this until we run out 
>>>>>>>> of light budget.  
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> We build to the lots passed, so we are not trying to optimize max 
>>>>>>>> usage per port.  Currently, we average about 50% utilization on our 
>>>>>>>> ports.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>> Mark                            mailto:m...@mailmt.com
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Myakka Technologies, Inc.
>>>>>>>> www.MyakkaTech.com
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ------
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Monday, February 12, 2018, 11:38:39 AM, you wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Maybe I need to review the math.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I was figuring on several small splitters along the route.  I didn't 
>>>>>>>> compare to a 1x32 in the cabinet because I figured if I brought every 
>>>>>>>> fiber back to the cabinet then I didn't save anything versus ethernet.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ------ Original Message ------
>>>>>>>> From: "Mark - Myakka Technologies" <m...@mailmt.com>
>>>>>>>> To: "Adam Moffett" <af@afmug.com>
>>>>>>>> Sent: 2/12/2018 11:30:46 AM
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Outdoor PON OLT
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Adam,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> How far are you going?  We are pushing almost 20 miles on a 1x32 
>>>>>>>> split.  Are you using one 1x32 or multiple smaller splitters?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>> Mark                            mailto:m...@mailmt.com
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Myakka Technologies, Inc.
>>>>>>>> www.MyakkaTech.com
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ------
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Sunday, February 11, 2018, 10:24:30 PM, you wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I'm looking at rural areas (like a few houses per mile).  As I'm 
>>>>>>>> looking at hypothetical power budgets for PON, I'm finding that if I 
>>>>>>>> run the line down the road and put splitters on the pole I can split 
>>>>>>>> 5-6 times and then I'm getting too low on db to keep going down the 
>>>>>>>> road.  At 5 or so houses per port, a 1U, 8 port ONT is no denser than 
>>>>>>>> a 1U switch.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Your stated reasons for PON are all correct.  The numbers just aren't 
>>>>>>>> seeming to work out for me.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I also figure if I install enough fibers for AE, I can still switch to 
>>>>>>>> PON some day if I want to.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> We would never max out the PON port, but looking back on the past 15 
>>>>>>>> years of growth in consumption I wonder if I should ever say "never". 
>>>>>>>> In AE I can put 100Gig in every house if I have to.  I'll "never" have 
>>>>>>>> to do that as far as I can imagine, but my imagination could be 
>>>>>>>> limited.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> -Adam
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ------ Original Message ------
>>>>>>>> From: "Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com>
>>>>>>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>>>>>>> Sent: 2/11/2018 9:28:34 PM
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Outdoor PON OLT
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> A few reasons...
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Port cost is still fairly high.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> More splicing.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> More fiber required.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Larger chassis required.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> More power required.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> More battery backup required.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Consumers not even close to using up 1-2 generations back of PON 
>>>>>>>> capacity in most places.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 7:53 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> So, why do PON and not active in these super cheap optics days?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> From: Chuck Hogg
>>>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2018 6:10 PM
>>>>>>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Outdoor PON OLT
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> We are walking away from them and Alphion...I think Mark's product 
>>>>>>>> with Zhone is different.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Chuck
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 2:29 PM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I think Chuck Hogg walked far away from DASAN...  or maybe it was 
>>>>>>>> DASAN that rescued them from the one they walked far away form. I 
>>>>>>>> don't remember which.  ;-)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> -----
>>>>>>>> Mike Hammett
>>>>>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Midwest Internet Exchange
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The Brothers WISP
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> From: "Jason McKemie" <j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com>
>>>>>>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2018 4:35:53 PM
>>>>>>>> Subject: [AFMUG] Outdoor PON OLT
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> In light of finding out that Calix's offering is not going to be 
>>>>>>>> anywhere near within budget, does anyone else have any other 
>>>>>>>> suggestions? 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I found these guys, but have never heard of them:
>>>>>>>> http://www.richerlink.com/en/products.asp?ClassID=116
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> It looks like DASAN also has an option - I've at least heard of them:
>>>>>>>> http://www.dasannetworks.com/product_images/V5806_20140520174927.pdf
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> -Jason
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>> 

Reply via email to