atom-syntax  

Messages by Date

• 2009/05/25 Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00 Julian Reschke
• 2009/05/25 Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00 Julian Reschke
• 2009/05/24 Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom) Geoffrey Sneddon
• 2009/05/21 Multilingual Atom Feeds Alexis Georges
• 2009/05/20 Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00 Nikunj R. Mehta
• 2009/05/20 Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00 Nikunj R. Mehta
• 2009/05/20 Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00 Peter Keane
• 2009/05/20 Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00 Nikunj R. Mehta
• 2009/05/15 atom and atompub errata Erik Wilde
• 2009/05/15 RE: format of atom:link/@type Brian Smith
• 2009/05/15 Re: format of atom:link/@type Erik Wilde
• 2009/05/15 Re: link relations and links in general Erik Wilde
• 2009/05/15 Re: format of atom:link/@type jasnell
• 2009/05/15 Re: format of atom:link/@type Richard Salz
• 2009/05/15 Re: format of atom:link/@type Julian Reschke
• 2009/05/15 Re: format of atom:link/@type Richard Salz
• 2009/05/15 RE: format of atom:link/@type Brian Smith
• 2009/05/15 format of atom:link/@type Julian Reschke
• 2009/05/15 Re: link relations and links in general Hadrien Gardeur
• 2009/05/15 Re: link relations and links in general Julian Reschke
• 2009/05/14 Re: link relations and links in general Hadrien Gardeur
• 2009/05/14 Re: link relations and links in general Nikunj Mehta
• 2009/05/14 Re: link relations and links in general Nikunj Mehta
• 2009/05/14 Re: link relations and links in general Erik Wilde
• 2009/05/14 link relations and links in general Erik Wilde
• 2009/05/13 Re: Proliferation of rel values for atom:link Peter Keane
• 2009/05/13 Re: Proliferation of rel values for atom:link Nikunj Mehta
• 2009/05/13 Re: Proliferation of rel values for atom:link Martin Atkins
• 2009/05/13 Re: Proliferation of rel values for atom:link Nikunj Mehta
• 2009/05/13 Re: Proliferation of rel values for atom:link Nikunj Mehta
• 2009/05/13 Re: Proliferation of rel values for atom:link Julian Reschke
• 2009/05/13 Proliferation of rel values for atom:link Nikunj Mehta
• 2009/05/13 Re: Hierarchy / Containment Nikunj Mehta
• 2009/05/13 Re: Hierarchy / Containment Julian Reschke
• 2009/05/12 Re: Hierarchy / Containment Nikunj Mehta
• 2009/05/12 Hierarchy / Containment Julian Reschke
• 2009/05/11 Re: Best current practice for collection discovery Hadrien Gardeur
• 2009/05/11 Re: Best current practice for collection discovery Nikunj Mehta
• 2009/05/11 Re: Best current practice for collection discovery James M Snell
• 2009/05/10 Re: Best current practice for collection discovery Peter Keane
• 2009/05/08 Best current practice for collection discovery Nikunj Mehta
• 2009/05/05 Re: [cmis-comment] Comments on CMIS link relations Mark Nottingham
• 2009/05/05 Re: Comments on CMIS link relations Mark Nottingham
• 2009/05/01 Re: atom feeds as sitemaps Erik Wilde
• 2009/05/01 atom feeds as sitemaps Ed Summers
• 2009/04/30 Comments on CMIS link relations Mark Nottingham
• 2009/04/24 Re: Using I-D:s for tombstones and checksums Peter Krantz
• 2009/04/16 Re: Should AtomPub allow app:categories in workspace? Eric Scheid
• 2009/04/15 Re: Should AtomPub allow app:categories in workspace? Sylvain Hellegouarch
• 2009/04/14 Should AtomPub allow app:categories in workspace? Ian Mayo
• 2009/04/07 Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links Mark Nottingham
• 2009/04/07 FW: [link draft] Changing the model for links Brian Smith
• 2009/04/07 Fwd: [link draft] Changing the model for links Mark Nottingham
• 2009/04/06 Re: Using I-D:s for tombstones and checksums Mark Nottingham
• 2009/04/04 Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom) Peter Keane
• 2009/04/04 Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom) Peter Keane
• 2009/04/04 Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom) James Holderness
• 2009/04/04 Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom) Geoffrey Sneddon
• 2009/03/28 Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom) John Panzer
• 2009/03/28 Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom) Peter Keane
• 2009/03/28 Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom) Peter Keane
• 2009/03/28 Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom) James Holderness
• 2009/03/27 Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom) Peter Keane
• 2009/03/27 Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom) James Holderness
• 2009/03/26 Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom) Peter Keane
• 2009/03/26 Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom) Geoffrey Sneddon
• 2009/03/25 Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom) John Panzer
• 2009/03/25 draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom) Geoffrey Sneddon
• 2009/03/20 AtomSite 0.9 Released, fully utilizing Atom extensibility Jarrett Vance
• 2009/03/12 Re: linking atom entries Aristotle Pagaltzis
• 2009/03/10 linking atom entries Peter Keane
• 2009/03/01 Re: feed autodiscovery Mark Nottingham
• 2009/03/01 Re: feed autodiscovery Jan Algermissen
• 2009/03/01 Re: feed autodiscovery Erik Wilde
• 2009/03/01 Re: feed autodiscovery Peter Keane
• 2009/03/01 Re: feed autodiscovery Aristotle Pagaltzis
• 2009/03/01 Re: feed autodiscovery Erik Wilde
• 2009/03/01 Re: feed autodiscovery Aristotle Pagaltzis
• 2009/02/26 Re: feed autodiscovery Erik Wilde
• 2009/02/26 RE: feed autodiscovery Joe Cheng
• 2009/02/25 feed autodiscovery Erik Wilde
• 2009/02/23 Re: Resources for Atom beginners Asbjørn Ulsberg
• 2009/02/22 Re: Resources for Atom beginners Erik Wilde
• 2009/02/22 Resources for Atom beginners Peter Keane
• 2009/02/19 Re: feedsets and atom:source Erik Wilde
• 2009/02/19 Re: Using I-D:s for tombstones and checksums James Holderness
• 2009/02/19 Link Extensions I-D (was Re: Using I-D:s for tombstones and checksums) Niklas Lindström
• 2009/02/19 Re: Using I-D:s for tombstones and checksums Niklas Lindström
• 2009/02/18 Re: Using I-D:s for tombstones and checksums James M Snell
• 2009/02/18 Re: Using I-D:s for tombstones and checksums James Holderness
• 2009/02/18 Re: Using I-D:s for tombstones and checksums James M Snell
• 2009/02/18 Using I-D:s for tombstones and checksums Niklas Lindström
• 2009/02/18 Re: feedsets and atom:source Richard Salz
• 2009/02/18 Re: feedsets and atom:source Peter Keane
• 2009/02/18 Re: feedsets and atom:source Bob Wyman
• 2009/02/18 Re: feedsets and atom:source Peter Keane
• 2009/02/18 RE: feedsets and atom:source Lindsley Brett-ABL001
• 2009/02/17 Re: feedsets and atom:source Bob Wyman
• 2009/02/17 Re: feedsets and atom:source James Holderness
• 2009/02/17 Re: feedsets and atom:source Erik Wilde
• 2009/02/17 Re: feedsets and atom:source James Holderness
• 2009/02/16 Re: feedsets and atom:source Eric Scheid
• 2009/02/16 Re: feedsets and atom:source Erik Wilde
• 2009/02/16 Re: feedsets and atom:source Aristotle Pagaltzis
• 2009/02/16 Re: Link relation registry request for "describedby" Asbjørn Ulsberg
• 2009/02/16 Re: feedsets and atom:source Erik Wilde
• 2009/02/16 Re: feedsets and atom:source Thomas Broyer
• 2009/02/10 Re: Question about sorting in Atom Sylvain Hellegouarch
• 2009/02/07 Question about sorting in Atom Peter Keane
• 2009/02/06 Re: Link relation registry request for "describedby" Julian Reschke
• 2009/02/06 Link relation registry request for "describedby" Lisa Dusseault
• 2009/02/03 Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057] Richard Salz
• 2009/02/03 Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057] Nikunj Mehta
• 2009/02/03 Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057] Keith Fahlgren
• 2009/02/03 Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057] Nikunj Mehta
• 2009/02/03 Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057] Nikunj Mehta
• 2009/02/03 Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057] Richard Salz
• 2009/02/03 Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057] Keith Fahlgren
• 2009/02/03 Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057] Nikunj Mehta
• 2009/02/03 Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057] James M Snell
• 2009/02/03 Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057] Richard Salz
• 2009/02/03 Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057] Richard Salz
• 2009/02/03 Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057] Julian Reschke
• 2009/02/03 Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057] Richard Salz
• 2009/02/03 Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057] James M Snell
• 2009/02/03 Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057] Richard Salz
• 2009/02/03 Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057] Julian Reschke
• 2009/02/03 Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057] James M Snell
• 2009/02/03 Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057] Richard Salz
• 2009/02/03 Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057] Richard Salz
• 2009/02/03 Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057] James M Snell
• 2009/02/03 Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057] Richard Salz
• 2009/02/03 Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057] James M Snell
• 2009/02/02 Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057] Eric Scheid
• 2009/02/02 Re: Fwd: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057] Richard Salz
• 2009/02/02 Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057] Richard Salz
• 2009/02/02 Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057] James Holderness
• 2009/02/02 Re: Fwd: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057] Bill de hOra
• 2009/02/02 Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057] Eric Scheid
• 2009/02/02 Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057] Thomas Broyer
• 2009/02/02 Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057] James Holderness
• 2009/02/02 Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057] Richard Salz
• 2009/02/02 Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057] Eric Scheid
• 2009/02/02 Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057] Eric Scheid
• 2009/02/02 Re: Fwd: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057] Julian Reschke
• 2009/02/02 Re: Fwd: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057] Richard Salz
• 2009/02/02 Re: Fwd: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057] Julian Reschke
• 2009/02/02 Re: Fwd: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057] Richard Salz
• 2009/02/02 Fwd: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057] Lisa Dusseault
• 2009/01/20 Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published"and"time this entry was added to this feed" James Holderness
• 2009/01/20 Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and"time this entry was added to this feed" Stephane Bortzmeyer
• 2009/01/18 Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed" Eric Scheid
• 2009/01/18 Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed" Peter Keane
• 2009/01/17 Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed" Eric Scheid
• 2009/01/17 Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed" Peter Keane
• 2009/01/16 Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed" Bill de hOra
• 2009/01/16 Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and"time this entry was added to this feed" Sylvain Hellegouarch
• 2009/01/15 Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and"time this entry was added to this feed" James Holderness
• 2009/01/15 Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and"time this entry was added to this feed" James M Snell
• 2009/01/15 RE: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and"time this entry was added to this feed" Dare Obasanjo
• 2009/01/15 Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and"time this entry was added to this feed" James Holderness
• 2009/01/13 Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed" Martin Atkins
• 2009/01/13 Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed" Peter Keane
• 2009/01/13 Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed" James M Snell
• 2009/01/13 Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed" Bill de hOra
• 2009/01/13 Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed" Bill de hOra
• 2009/01/13 Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed" Bill de hOra
• 2009/01/13 Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and"time this entry was added to this feed" Martin Atkins
• 2009/01/13 Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and"time this entry was added to this feed" James Holderness
• 2009/01/13 Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed" Martin Atkins
• 2009/01/13 Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed" Aristotle Pagaltzis
• 2009/01/13 Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed" Martin Atkins
• 2009/01/13 Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed" Aristotle Pagaltzis
• 2009/01/13 Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed" Aristotle Pagaltzis
• 2009/01/12 Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed" Antone Roundy
• 2009/01/12 Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed" Martin Atkins
• 2009/01/12 RE: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed" Dare Obasanjo
• 2009/01/12 Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed" Martin Atkins
• 2009/01/12 Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed" James Holderness
• 2009/01/11 RE: Some Draft Atom-related Specs for Activity Streams Dare Obasanjo
• 2009/01/11 Re: Some Draft Atom-related Specs for Activity Streams Martin Atkins
• 2009/01/11 Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed" Peter Keane
• 2009/01/11 The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed" Martin Atkins
• 2009/01/11 Re: Some Draft Atom-related Specs for Activity Streams Martin Atkins
• 2009/01/08 RE: Some Draft Atom-related Specs for Activity Streams Dare Obasanjo
• 2009/01/08 Re: Some Draft Atom-related Specs for Activity Streams Bill de hOra
• 2009/01/08 Re: Is atom:content *the* place to put content? James Holderness
• 2009/01/08 RE: Some Draft Atom-related Specs for Activity Streams Dare Obasanjo
• 2009/01/08 Re: Some Draft Atom-related Specs for Activity Streams Martin Atkins
• 2009/01/08 Re: Some Draft Atom-related Specs for Activity Streams Bill de hOra
• 2009/01/08 Re: Is atom:content *the* place to put content? Bill de hOra
• 2009/01/08 Re: Some Draft Atom-related Specs for Activity Streams Bill de hOra
• 2009/01/08 Re: Is atom:content *the* place to put content? Tim Bray
• 2009/01/08 Re: Some Draft Atom-related Specs for Activity Streams Martin Atkins
• 2009/01/08 RE: Some Draft Atom-related Specs for Activity Streams Dare Obasanjo
• 2009/01/07 Re: Is atom:content *the* place to put content? James Holderness
• 2009/01/07 Re: Is atom:content *the* place to put content? Aristotle Pagaltzis
• 2009/01/06 Re: Is atom:content *the* place to put content? James M Snell
• 2009/01/06 Re: Is atom:content *the* place to put content? Martin Atkins
• 2009/01/06 Is atom:content *the* place to put content? Richard Salz

• Earlier messages
• Later messages