atom-syntax  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: New Link Relations -- Ready to go? Thomas Broyer
  • Re: New Link Relations -- Ready to go? James Holderness
  • Re: New Link Relations -- Ready to go? Thomas Broyer
  • Re: New Link Relations -- Ready to go? Thomas Broyer
  • Re: New Link Relations -- Ready to go? Mark Nottingham
  • Re: New Link Relations -- Ready to go? James M Snell
  • Re: New Link Relations -- Ready to go? Thomas Broyer
  • Re: New Link Relations -- Ready to go? Eric Scheid
  • Re: New Link Relations -- Ready to go? James Holderness
  • Re: New Link Relations -- Ready to go? Antone Roundy
  • Re: New Link Relations -- Ready to go? James Holderness
  • Re: New Link Relations -- Ready to go? Thomas Broyer
  • Re: New Link Relations -- Ready to go? James Holderness
  • Re: New Link Relations -- Ready to go? Antone Roundy
  • Re: New Link Relations -- Ready to go? James Holderness
  • Re: New Link Relations -- Ready to go? Antone Roundy
  • Re: New Link Relations -- Ready to go? Peter Robinson
  • Re: New Link Relations -- Ready to go? Robert Sayre
  • RE: New Link Relations -- Ready to go? Byrne Reese
  • RE: New Link Relations -- Ready to go? Byrne Reese
• Re: General/Specific [was: Feed History / Protocol overlap] Antone Roundy
  • RE: General/Specific [was: Feed History / Protocol overlap] Byrne Reese
• Feed History / Protocol overlap Robert Sayre
  • Re: Feed History / Protocol overlap Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Feed History / Protocol overlap Robert Sayre
  • Re: Feed History / Protocol overlap Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Feed History / Protocol overlap Robert Sayre
  • Re: Feed History / Protocol overlap Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Feed History / Protocol overlap Robert Sayre
  • Re: Feed History / Protocol overlap Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Feed History / Protocol overlap Robert Sayre
  • Re: Feed History / Protocol overlap James M Snell
  • Re: Feed History / Protocol overlap Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Feed History / Protocol overlap Thomas Broyer
  • Re: Feed History / Protocol overlap Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Feed History / Protocol overlap Robert Sayre
  • Re: Feed History / Protocol overlap Antone Roundy
  • Re: Feed History / Protocol overlap James M Snell
  • Re: Feed History / Protocol overlap Antone Roundy
  • Re: Feed History / Protocol overlap Robert Sayre
  • Re: Feed History / Protocol overlap Antone Roundy
  • Re: Feed History / Protocol overlap Antone Roundy
  • Re: Feed History / Protocol overlap Thomas Broyer
  • General/Specific [was: Feed History / Protocol overlap] Mark Nottingham
  • Re: General/Specific [was: Feed History / Protocol overlap] James M Snell
  • Re: General/Specific [was: Feed History / Protocol overlap] James Holderness
  • Re: General/Specific [was: Feed History / Protocol overlap] Thomas Broyer
  • Re: General/Specific [was: Feed History / Protocol overlap] Thomas Broyer
  • Re: General/Specific [was: Feed History / Protocol overlap] Eric Scheid
  • Re: General/Specific [was: Feed History / Protocol overlap] Stefan Eissing
  • Re: General/Specific [was: Feed History / Protocol overlap] Joe Gregorio
  • Re: Feed History / Protocol overlap Eric Scheid
  • Re: Feed History / Protocol overlap Eric Scheid
  • Re: Feed History / Protocol overlap Robert Sayre
  • Re: Feed History / Protocol overlap Eric Scheid
  • Re: Feed History / Protocol overlap Bill de hÓra
  • Re: Feed History / Protocol overlap Eric Scheid
• Spec wording bug? Danny Ayers
  • Re: Spec wording bug? Paul Hoffman
  • Re: Spec wording bug? Antone Roundy
  • Re: Spec wording bug? Robert Sayre
  • Re: Spec wording bug? Danny Ayers
• Re: draft-snell-atompub-feed-thread-01.txt Byrne Reese
  • Re: draft-snell-atompub-feed-thread-01.txt Thomas Broyer
  • Re: draft-snell-atompub-feed-thread-01.txt James M Snell
• Signifying a Complete Feed Byrne Reese
  • Re: Signifying a Complete Feed A. Pagaltzis
  • Re: Signifying a Complete Feed James M Snell
  • Re: Signifying a Complete Feed James Holderness
  • Re: Signifying a Complete Feed James M Snell
  • Re: Signifying a Complete Feed A. Pagaltzis
  • Re: Signifying a Complete Feed Graham
  • Re: Signifying a Complete Feed Robert Sayre
  • Re: Signifying a Complete Feed James Holderness
  • RE: Signifying a Complete Feed Byrne Reese
• more than one content element? Pascal Philippe
  • Re: more than one content element? James Holderness
  • Re: more than one content element? A. Pagaltzis
  • Re: more than one content element? James Holderness
  • Re: more than one content element? John Panzer
  • Re: more than one content element? A. Pagaltzis
  • Re: more than one content element? John Panzer
  • Re: more than one content element? A. Pagaltzis
  • Re: more than one content element? Antone Roundy
  • Re: more than one content element? James Holderness
  • Re: more than one content element? Eric Scheid
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-05.txt Internet-Drafts
• Re: Straw Poll: age:expires vs. dcterms:valid (was Re: Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt) On Oct 8, 2005, at 8:37 AM, James M Snell wrote: I wanted to indicate that a gi Antone Roundy
  • Re: Straw Poll: age:expires vs. ...... plus a gazillion words Antone Roundy
• re: Straw Poll: age:expires vs. dcterms:valid Robert Sayre
• FYI: Google Reader and Atom 1.0 James M Snell
  • Re: FYI: Google Reader and Atom 1.0 Julian Reschke
  • Re: FYI: Google Reader and Atom 1.0 Robert Sayre
  • Re: FYI: Google Reader and Atom 1.0 James M Snell
• FYI: Advertising Web services with Atom 1.0 James M Snell
  • Re: FYI: Advertising Web services with Atom 1.0 Aleksander Slominski
  • Re: FYI: Advertising Web services with Atom 1.0 A. Pagaltzis
  • Re: FYI: Advertising Web services with Atom 1.0 James M Snell
  • Re: FYI: Advertising Web services with Atom 1.0 A. Pagaltzis
  • Re: FYI: Advertising Web services with Atom 1.0 James M Snell
  • Re: FYI: Advertising Web services with Atom 1.0 Aleksander Slominski
  • Re: FYI: Advertising Web services with Atom 1.0 James M Snell
• Question about [EMAIL PROTECTED] Byrne Reese
  • Re: Question about [EMAIL PROTECTED] James M Snell
  • Re: Question about [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tim Bray
  • Re: Question about [EMAIL PROTECTED] A. Pagaltzis
  • Re: Question about [EMAIL PROTECTED] A. Pagaltzis
• Next and Previous Alan Gutierrez
  • Re: Next and Previous Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Next and Previous James Holderness
  • Re: Next and Previous Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Next and Previous Thomas Broyer
  • Re: Next and Previous James Holderness
  • Re: Next and Previous Thomas Broyer
  • Re: Next and Previous James Holderness
  • Re: Next and Previous James M Snell
  • Re: Next and Previous James Holderness
• ACE - Atom Common Extensions Namespace James M Snell
  • Re: ACE - Atom Common Extensions Namespace Eric Scheid
  • Re: ACE - Atom Common Extensions Namespace James M Snell
  • Re: ACE - Atom Common Extensions Namespace A. Pagaltzis
  • Re: ACE - Atom Common Extensions Namespace James M Snell
  • Re: ACE - Atom Common Extensions Namespace A. Pagaltzis
  • Re: ACE - Atom Common Extensions Namespace Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: ACE - Atom Common Extensions Namespace James M Snell
  • Re: ACE - Atom Common Extensions Namespace Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: ACE - Atom Common Extensions Namespace James M Snell
  • Re: ACE - Atom Common Extensions Namespace Martin Duerst
  • Re: ACE - Atom Common Extensions Namespace Walter Underwood
  • Re: ACE - Atom Common Extensions Namespace Martin Duerst
  • Re: ACE - Atom Common Extensions Namespace Thomas Broyer
  • Re: ACE - Atom Common Extensions Namespace Bill de hÓra
  • Re: ACE - Atom Common Extensions Namespace James M Snell
  • Re: ACE - Atom Common Extensions Namespace Justin Fletcher
  • Re: ACE - Atom Common Extensions Namespace James M Snell
  • Re: ACE - Atom Common Extensions Namespace Justin Fletcher
  • Re: ACE - Atom Common Extensions Namespace Mark Nottingham
  • Re: ACE - Atom Common Extensions Namespace Henry Story
  • Re: ACE - Atom Common Extensions Namespace Antone Roundy
  • Re: ACE - Atom Common Extensions Namespace A. Pagaltzis
  • Re: ACE - Atom Common Extensions Namespace James M Snell
  • Re: ACE - Atom Common Extensions Namespace Thomas Broyer
• Revised Feed Ranking Draft James M Snell
• Entries in multiple language Reto Bachmann-Gmür
  • Re: Entries in multiple language Henry Story
  • Re: Entries in multiple language Reto Bachmann-Gmür
  • Re: Entries in multiple language Zhang Yining
  • Re: Entries in multiple language Reto Bachmann-Gmür
• Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-license-03.txt James M Snell
• Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt James M Snell
  • Re: Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt Henry Story
  • Re: Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt James M Snell
  • Re: Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt James Holderness
  • Re: Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt James M Snell
  • Re: Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt James Holderness
  • Re: Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt James M Snell
  • Re: Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt James Holderness
  • Re: Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt James Holderness
  • Re: Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt James M Snell
  • Straw Poll: age:expires vs. dcterms:valid (was Re: Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt) James M Snell
  • Re: Straw Poll: age:expires vs. dcterms:valid (was Re: Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt) James Holderness
  • Re: Straw Poll: age:expires vs. dcterms:valid (was Re: Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt) James M Snell
  • Re: Straw Poll: age:expires vs. dcterms:valid (was Re: Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt) Eric Scheid
  • Re: Straw Poll: age:expires vs. dcterms:valid (was Re: Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt) James M Snell
  • Re: Straw Poll: age:expires vs. dcterms:valid (was Re: Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt) James Holderness
  • Re: Straw Poll: age:expires vs. dcterms:valid (was Re: Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt) Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Straw Poll: age:expires vs. dcterms:valid (was Re: Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt) Phil Ringnalda
  • Re: Straw Poll: age:expires vs. dcterms:valid (was Re: Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt) Mark Nottingham
• Unofficial Last Call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-nofollow-02.txt James M Snell
  • On individual submissions for standards-track RFCs Paul Hoffman
• Deployment: millions A. Pagaltzis
• [feedvalidator] Two entries with the same value for atom:updated Julian Reschke
  • Re: [feedvalidator] Two entries with the same value for atom:updated James Holderness
  • Re: [feedvalidator] Two entries with the same value for atom:updated Julian Reschke
• Arr! Avast me hearties! Eric Scheid
  • Re: Arr! Avast me hearties! A. Pagaltzis
  • Re: Arr! Avast me hearties! James Aylett
  • Re: Arr! Avast me hearties! James Holderness
  • Re: Arr! Avast me hearties! Walter Underwood
• [feedvalidator] ' is not HTML Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: [feedvalidator] ' is not HTML Graham
• [Off topic] FYI: Microsoft Gadgets and RSS 2.0 James M Snell
• FYI: Updated Index draft James M Snell
  • FYI: Updated Index draft James M Snell
  • Re: FYI: Updated Index draft David Powell
  • Re: FYI: Updated Index draft James M Snell
  • Re: FYI: Updated Index draft Eric Scheid
  • Re: FYI: Updated Index draft James M Snell
  • Re: FYI: Updated Index draft Thomas Broyer
  • Re: FYI: Updated Index draft Eric Scheid
  • Re: FYI: Updated Index draft James M Snell
  • Re: FYI: Updated Index draft Eric Scheid
  • Re: FYI: Updated Index draft James Holderness
  • Re: FYI: Updated Index draft Eric Scheid
  • Re: FYI: Updated Index draft James Holderness
  • Re: FYI: Updated Index draft James M Snell
  • Re: FYI: Updated Index draft Antone Roundy
  • Re: FYI: Updated Index draft James M Snell
  • Re: FYI: Updated Index draft Antone Roundy

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]