The BMW UUC Digest 
Volume 2 : Issue 761 : "text" Format

Messages in this Issue:
  Re: <E36> Throttle plate cleaning
  Re: Mercedes reference needed ASAP ..
  Re: Mercedes reference needed ASAP ..
  Re: Mercedes reference needed ASAP ..
  Re: Mercedes reference needed ASAP ..
  Re: Mercedes reference needed ASAP ..
  Re: Mercedes reference needed ASAP ..
  Re: Mercedes reference needed ASAP ..
  Re: Mercedes reference needed ASAP ..
  Re: <E36> Low idle problem fixed
  FF (WOB)..E32 parts ??
  Re: Mercedes reference needed ASAP ..Now snow tires
  Re: Mercedes reference needed ASAP ..Now snow tires

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 22:57:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: Brian Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: UUC Digest <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: <E36> Throttle plate cleaning
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Kevin,

There are two different formulas for intake cleaner. 
As I've understood it, the cans labeled as "carb
cleaner" are harsher chemicals (but probably clean
better), and can damage the oxygen sensor because of
their harshness (I would explain better if I knew
which chemicals they were).  True carb cleaner doesn't
need to be burned off as well in a carbureted engine
because of the lack of higher precision emissions
control devices.  In an EFI engine, I guess there's
more probability of damage with the harsher chemicals.
Perhaps the chemicals in carb cleaner are more
oxidative when burned, and damage the O2 sensor that
way, I'm not quite sure.

There is "throttle body cleaner" which is less harsh
but still seems to clean pretty well.  It is a
solution of toluene and other chemicals.  This is what
you need to use.

Brian
95 M3

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Since I have the Dinan CAI on the E36 with the cloth
> intake filter, I
> thought I  would clean around the throttle plate
> this weekend (it might
> also reduce the cold engine temperament) but I've
> seen cautions about using
> Carb Cleaner as possibly harming the O2 sensor. I've
> never heard of this
> before, can anyone shed some light on this?
> 
> -Kevin
> 
>
----------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>  This  e-mail  communication is confidential and is
> intended only 
>  for  the individual(s) or entity named above and
> others who have 
>  been  specifically  authorized to receive it. If
> you are not the 
>  intended  recipient,  please  do not read, copy,
> use or disclose 
>  the  contents of this communication to others.
> Please notify the 
>  sender  that  you have received this e-mail in
> error by replying 
>  to  the e-mail.  Please then delete the e-mail and
> any copies of 
>  it. Thank you.                                     
>              
> 
>
----------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> Search the
>
ARCHIVES:http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
> 
> 
>
__________________________________________________________________________
> In memory of Michel Potheau - friend, enthusiast,
> founder of the BMW CCA.
> 
> UUC Motorwerks - BMW Performance Fine-tuning and
> home of the Ultimate
> Short Shifter - accept no substitutes!
> 908-874-9092 . http://www.uucmotorwerks.com
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 07:12:33 -0400
From: "Woody" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "BMWBits" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Uucdigest" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Mercedes reference needed ASAP ..
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Try Rick Ellinger at RC Imports in Rockville, MD for information.  Rick and 
wife Cindy have been racing and servicing the 190E 16V for many years.
btw, I believe the M3 was BMW's (better) answer to the 190 16v.

http://www.rc-imports.com/

Woody Hair

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "BMWBits" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [UUC] Mercedes reference needed ASAP ..


> Anyone got a good baseline reference to the M-B 190 2.3-16 ?? It was
> their 'answer' to the BMW E30 M3 ...didnt answer it very well on the
> track, but still a nice road-car . 



------------------------------

Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 09:03:08 -0400
From: "Gary Derian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Uucdigest" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Mercedes reference needed ASAP ..
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I thought they were both "homologation specials" for some racing class in 
Europe.
Gary Derian

> btw, I believe the M3 was BMW's (better) answer to the 190 16v.
>
>
>> Anyone got a good baseline reference to the M-B 190 2.3-16 ?? It was
>> their 'answer' to the BMW E30 M3 ...didnt answer it very well on the
>> track, but still a nice road-car .
.com 


------------------------------

Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 09:07:16 -0400 
From: "Della Barba, Joe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Uucdigest <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Mercedes reference needed ASAP ..
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I had a 190E 2.3. 
It isn't exactly the best car Mercedes ever made. It was real fun when some
electrical short made all the windows quit working and made the heat go full
on! I drove 80 miles home holding the door open with my foot trying not to
die from heatstroke. I can think of plenty of other cars I would buy before
I got another one. BTW it needed a new cylinder head at 50,000 miles. It was
also the ALL TIME RECORD HOLDER of the worst car to drive in snow. A F1 car
on bald tires turned up to full boost would be better. I once got in it and
it took off down the parking lot slope and into the woods and I hadn't even
started it yet!


Joe Della Barba
323iT
MR2 MKII
Avalon

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Whit Lowell
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 12:05 AM
To: BMWBits
Cc: Uucdigest
Subject: [UUC] Mercedes reference needed ASAP ..

I think it deserves a COMPLETELY O/T subject addendum, but anyway...

The "Mercedes Tercel", as dubbed by Winfred Dixon, and the intimation of
ownership in the same sentence.....You can't be serious?!?

Check: the motor...cam lobe wear is, evidently, a big problem.

best, whit


On 8/4/05, BMWBits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone got a good baseline reference to the M-B 190 2.3-16 ?? It was 
> their 'answer' to the BMW E30 M3 ...didnt answer it very well on the 
> track, but still a nice road-car .Cheaper'n M3s too ..not much but 
> some ..
> There's one for sale locally that I want to go take a look at/drive in 
> tomorrow so I need some quick points of reference .
> This one sounds like a 'hardly-driven garage queen ' from his 
> description on the phone so I don't want to miss it if it is good 
> ..but I need to be able to recognise 'good' when its stood in front of me
..
> 2.3 litre 16 valve , 5-speed , 4-door (2 more than the M3 !!) , 
> aero-effects (airdam, rear spoiler etc ) ....but it's that hidden 
> stuff I need to know . Does it need 4,000 rpm before it comes alight ? Or
5k ?
> . Where are the weaknesses -gearbox? Driveline ? Diff? , suspension 
> components ?  Were Recaro-style seats stock ? ..yada yada ...
> So , anyone got a good 'go-to' reference for me to start at ??
> 
> Bill Proud
> 
> 
> Search the 
> ARCHIVES:http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> ____ In memory of Michel Potheau - friend, enthusiast, founder of the 
> BMW CCA.
> 
> UUC Motorwerks - BMW Performance Fine-tuning and home of the Ultimate 
> Short Shifter - accept no substitutes!
> 908-874-9092 . http://www.uucmotorwerks.com
>

Search the ARCHIVES:http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]


__________________________________________________________________________
In memory of Michel Potheau - friend, enthusiast, founder of the BMW CCA.

UUC Motorwerks - BMW Performance Fine-tuning and home of the Ultimate Short
Shifter - accept no substitutes!
908-874-9092 . http://www.uucmotorwerks.com

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 09:40:40 -0400 
From: "Della Barba, Joe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Uucdigest <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Mercedes reference needed ASAP ..
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

 Not entirely true. It also depends on the weight distribution and total
weight. My MR2 is fairly decent in snow because of the weight on the rear
wheels. Likewise FWD cars have an edge with more than half the weight on the
driven wheels. An old VW Bug or 911 is an interesting ride in snow. They
don't get stuck with all that weight on the rear wheels, but they really
would rather be going backwards so you are constantly having the back of the
car try to pass the front.


Joe Della Barba


-----Original Message-----
From: Gary Derian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 9:17 AM
To: Della Barba, Joe; Uucdigest
Subject: Re: [UUC] Mercedes reference needed ASAP ..

Snow performance is all about the tires so you can't blame that on the car.
Gary Derian



>I had a 190E 2.3.
> It isn't exactly the best car Mercedes ever made. It was real fun when  
>some  electrical short made all the windows quit working and made the 
>heat go  full  on! I drove 80 miles home holding the door open with my 
>foot trying not to  die from heatstroke. I can think of plenty of other 
>cars I would buy  before  I got another one. BTW it needed a new 
>cylinder head at 50,000 miles. It  was  also the ALL TIME RECORD HOLDER 
>of the worst car to drive in snow. A F1  car  on bald tires turned up 
>to full boost would be better. I once got in it  and  it took off down 
>the parking lot slope and into the woods and I hadn't  even  started it 
>yet!
>
>
> Joe Della Barba
> 323iT
> MR2 MKII
> Avalon

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 09:17:01 -0400
From: "Gary Derian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Della Barba, Joe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
   "Uucdigest" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Mercedes reference needed ASAP ..
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Snow performance is all about the tires so you can't blame that on the car.
Gary Derian



>I had a 190E 2.3.
> It isn't exactly the best car Mercedes ever made. It was real fun when 
> some
> electrical short made all the windows quit working and made the heat go 
> full
> on! I drove 80 miles home holding the door open with my foot trying not to
> die from heatstroke. I can think of plenty of other cars I would buy 
> before
> I got another one. BTW it needed a new cylinder head at 50,000 miles. It 
> was
> also the ALL TIME RECORD HOLDER of the worst car to drive in snow. A F1 
> car
> on bald tires turned up to full boost would be better. I once got in it 
> and
> it took off down the parking lot slope and into the woods and I hadn't 
> even
> started it yet!
>
>
> Joe Della Barba
> 323iT
> MR2 MKII
> Avalon


------------------------------

Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 07:11:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tammer Farid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Mercedes reference needed ASAP ..
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

That doesn't make sense; if the rear-engine weight
distribution increases traction on that end then a 911 in
snow would understeer like a MkIV Jetta (which is to say,
incessantly).  Little weight on the front tires => less
traction up front => plowing straight ahead.  Of course you
may be talking about a situation where you've started the
turn and then broken traction in the rear, in which case
you need to be gentler with the throttle.

Click and Clack say BMWs are bad in the snow.  I think they
have yet to discover the snow tire.  My E28 got stuck in
snow only the one time time I got caught in a storm on
summer tires.

-tammer 

--- "Della Barba, Joe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Likewise FWD cars have an edge with more than
> half the weight on the
> driven wheels. An old VW Bug or 911 is an interesting
> ride in snow. They
> don't get stuck with all that weight on the rear wheels,
> but they really
> would rather be going backwards so you are constantly
> having the back of the
> car try to pass the front.
> 
> 
> Joe Della Barba


                
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail for Mobile 
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone. 
http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail 

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 07:21:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: Carlos Lopez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Tammer Farid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: Mercedes reference needed ASAP ..
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--- Tammer Farid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Click and Clack say BMWs are bad in the snow.  I think they
> have yet to discover the snow tire.  My E28 got stuck in
> snow only the one time time I got caught in a storm on
> summer tires.

Someone I once bought snow tires from told me his E30 M3 was about the
worse vehicle he had ever driven in snow only 2nd worse to his E30
325is because of all the torque.  WTF????

I drove my E30 M3 one winter and it was by far the most fun I've ever
had, and my 325is is my winter beater for a reason.  I love E30s in the
snow w/snow tires of course.

Carlos.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 10:05:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Della Barba, Joe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Uucdigest" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Mercedes reference needed ASAP ..
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

"but they really would rather be going backwards so you are constantly
having the back of the car try to pass the front."

This is just the result of it being rear wheel drive (pushing the car),
not because the motor is in the back.
Ryan-








 Not entirely true. It also depends on the weight distribution and total
> weight. My MR2 is fairly decent in snow because of the weight on the rear
> wheels. Likewise FWD cars have an edge with more than half the weight on
> the
> driven wheels. An old VW Bug or 911 is an interesting ride in snow. They
> don't get stuck with all that weight on the rear wheels, but they really
> would rather be going backwards so you are constantly having the back of
> the
> car try to pass the front.
>
>
> Joe Della Barba
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gary Derian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 9:17 AM
> To: Della Barba, Joe; Uucdigest
> Subject: Re: [UUC] Mercedes reference needed ASAP ..
>
> Snow performance is all about the tires so you can't blame that on the
> car.
> Gary Derian
>
>
>
>>I had a 190E 2.3.
>> It isn't exactly the best car Mercedes ever made. It was real fun when
>>some  electrical short made all the windows quit working and made the
>>heat go  full  on! I drove 80 miles home holding the door open with my
>>foot trying not to  die from heatstroke. I can think of plenty of other
>>cars I would buy  before  I got another one. BTW it needed a new
>>cylinder head at 50,000 miles. It  was  also the ALL TIME RECORD HOLDER
>>of the worst car to drive in snow. A F1  car  on bald tires turned up
>>to full boost would be better. I once got in it  and  it took off down
>>the parking lot slope and into the woods and I hadn't  even  started it
>>yet!
>>
>>
>> Joe Della Barba
>> 323iT
>> MR2 MKII
>> Avalon
> Search the ARCHIVES:http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> In memory of Michel Potheau - friend, enthusiast, founder of the BMW CCA.
>
> UUC Motorwerks - BMW Performance Fine-tuning and home of the Ultimate
> Short Shifter - accept no substitutes!
> 908-874-9092 . http://www.uucmotorwerks.com
>


------------------------------

Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 08:51:11 -0500
From: "Malcolm Reitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: <E36> Low idle problem fixed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I replaced the ignition switch last night and the car started up. But,
it still idled very low and died when I lifted off the throttle. So, I
fiddled with the throttle position switch a bit, and then figured I
might as well pull the ICV and see if cleaning it would help. I sprayed
the ICV with about 1/2 a can of 3M Throttle Cleaner (endorsed by
NASCAR!) and dang if the car didn't start idling smoothly again. So,
I'll just chalk this up to a weird coincidence that the ICV stuck at the
same time the ignition switch broke.

Malcolm
'88 M5 (back to weekend warrior status)
'98 328i (drove it to work today)

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Malcolm Reitz
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 10:19 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [UUC] <E36> Low idle problem

An odd problem here...

Last weekend, I went to start the car and the ignition key moved to
"Run" and froze. It would turn backwards or forwards. I left the car
overnight, returned the next day and I eventually pulled the ignition
switch off the lock assembly and the key started turning again. The car
still wouldn't start (switch moved to "Start" but the starter never
engaged). I found I could jump the starter position and get the car
running, so I think the switch is bad. So far, OK. But, the odd part is
that, when the car does start now, it idles extremely low, probably
under 300 RPM according to the tach. This means the engine has a
tendency to die when I come to a stop with the clutch in, or when I turn
on the AC.

Any ideas on what has happened to the idle? Surely, it can't be related
to the ignition switch, or can it?

Thanks!

Malcolm
'88 M5 (doing daily driver duty this week)
'98 328i (hard starting and barely running)


Search the
ARCHIVES:http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]


________________________________________________________________________
__
In memory of Michel Potheau - friend, enthusiast, founder of the BMW
CCA.

UUC Motorwerks - BMW Performance Fine-tuning and home of the Ultimate
Short Shifter - accept no substitutes!
908-874-9092 . http://www.uucmotorwerks.com


------------------------------

Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 09:17:07 -0500
From: "BMWBits" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "E9coupes BMW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
   "Senior Six Digest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
   "Sixer coupe Group" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
   "Uucdigest" <[email protected]>
Subject: FF (WOB)..E32 parts ??
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I have an opportunity to buy a 1988 735 tomorrow at a local auction
(mid-south Tenn ) probably for very cheap . 
I am tossing up whether to try and part it out or restore it if it
becomes mine all mine ...
I suspect that it'd cost more than it's worth by far to restore , but if
anyone reasonably close to Nashville has a parts-car already I'd be
interested in talking prices ...for parts .
This one needs a new windshield , a left-hand front (driver's) armrest
in grey , a front passenger seat bottom in grey-blue . There's a ton of
little nicky-nacky stuff like the glovebox straps, lenses over the
lights at bottom of doors etc but for now I don’t remember them all -I
just know I'll need them if I take it on .
Relative to the alternative ...parting it out, OR passing it on to
someone else ...It has been a 'southern car' as far back as I can tell .
There is NO rust anywhere visible BUT there are dents on RF fender , and
both doors on rh side so it will need some straightening ...NO
frame=pulling it just looks like it bumped something small . The engine
is super-clean and complete but I havent heard it running yet-obviously
a 3.5 litre that'd fit into LOTS of big-six cars from E9 coupes to 5,6
or 7 series  .If it had a manual trans I wouldn’t dream of selling the
car (even tho it aint mine yet !!) so yes it IS automatic and again I
have NO idea how good or bad it is ..but car is tagged til end of this
mo so presume it has been running lately .
Oh yes , it has a set of bloody awful looking whore-house 17" wheels
-chrome with fat spokes -that will be immediately for sale if it becomes
mine (fit most 5,6,7 series )...they have performance tires on 'em ..So2
I think along with Pirelli P6s of 245/45 size range-minimal tread .I'd
put the stock 15's from my 750i onto it instead ..MUCH less of a
whorehouse effect ! .The headlights/grille etc are perfect . Toolkit has
NO tools but the box is in good shape etc etc ...tell me what you'd want
....
The dilemma therefore is the ultimate question ...DOES ANYONE NEED PARTS
?? OR A WHOLE RUST-FREE SHELL . There is NO doubt in my mind that it
could be restored , but it's gonna take some sweat equity ...

So ..before I leave for the auction around 8 AM sat I need to hear from
any interested parties.PLEASE post this note to other places where there
might be interest ...roadfly? 

Bill Proud , 36 yrs messing with BMWs
Ph 931-424-6501 at reasonable hours     



------------------------------

Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 10:27:20 -0400 
From: "Della Barba, Joe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Mercedes reference needed ASAP ..Now snow tires
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

 Imagine you are in your Beetle or 911 and you are going around a corner in
the snow. If you feel the back tires start to break loose, you can do
nothing and the car will spin. You can hit the brakes and the rear tires
will brake loose and the car will spin. You can hit the gas and get exactly
the same result! You can put the clutch in and steer like mad and you MIGHT
pull it out. With all that weight out back once it gets moving you have a
LOT of momentum to deal with. What happened to me was frequently I would
correct for the first excursion and then the car would spin the other way.
And yes, you also do get the front tires not doing much, but I added 50
pounds in the front trunk that fixed much of that. When I finally got rid of
that car and had a 914 it was SO much better. As long as the snow wasn't
deep enough for the car to "run aground" it was a rocket in snow. I expect
my 323iT with DSC to be pretty decent in snow that isn't deeper than my
ground clearance. 


Joe Della Barba
323iT
Avalon
MR2 MK II


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tammer Farid
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 10:11 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [UUC] Mercedes reference needed ASAP ..

That doesn't make sense; if the rear-engine weight distribution increases
traction on that end then a 911 in snow would understeer like a MkIV Jetta
(which is to say, incessantly).  Little weight on the front tires => less
traction up front => plowing straight ahead.  Of course you may be talking
about a situation where you've started the turn and then broken traction in
the rear, in which case you need to be gentler with the throttle.

Click and Clack say BMWs are bad in the snow.  I think they have yet to
discover the snow tire.  My E28 got stuck in snow only the one time time I
got caught in a storm on summer tires.

-tammer 

--- "Della Barba, Joe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Likewise FWD cars have an edge with more than half the weight on the 
> driven wheels. An old VW Bug or 911 is an interesting ride in snow. 
> They don't get stuck with all that weight on the rear wheels, but they 
> really would rather be going backwards so you are constantly having 
> the back of the car try to pass the front.
> 
> 
> Joe Della Barba


                
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail for Mobile
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone. 
http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail
Search the ARCHIVES:http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]


__________________________________________________________________________
In memory of Michel Potheau - friend, enthusiast, founder of the BMW CCA.

UUC Motorwerks - BMW Performance Fine-tuning and home of the Ultimate Short
Shifter - accept no substitutes!
908-874-9092 . http://www.uucmotorwerks.com

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 07:36:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tammer Farid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Mercedes reference needed ASAP ..Now snow tires
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Sounds like fun!  <g>  Did it have snow tires?  I would
probably try the steer like mad, correct in advance for the
opposite swing (you know it's coming), and don't
lift/declutch but just hold the gas where it is method. 
However, I've never driven a 911 in the snow so it could be
way worse than I'm imagining.

-tammer <--smug when speaking with no experience ;-),
front-engine cars only

--- "Della Barba, Joe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  Imagine you are in your Beetle or 911 and you are going
> around a corner in
> the snow. If you feel the back tires start to break
> loose, you can do
> nothing and the car will spin. You can hit the brakes and
> the rear tires
> will brake loose and the car will spin. You can hit the
> gas and get exactly
> the same result! You can put the clutch in and steer like
> mad and you MIGHT
> pull it out. With all that weight out back once it gets
> moving you have a
> LOT of momentum to deal with. What happened to me was
> frequently I would
> correct for the first excursion and then the car would
> spin the other way.
> And yes, you also do get the front tires not doing much,
> but I added 50
> pounds in the front trunk that fixed much of that. When I
> finally got rid of
> that car and had a 914 it was SO much better. As long as
> the snow wasn't
> deep enough for the car to "run aground" it was a rocket
> in snow. I expect
> my 323iT with DSC to be pretty decent in snow that isn't
> deeper than my
> ground clearance. 
> 
> 
> Joe Della Barba
> 323iT
> Avalon
> MR2 MK II


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

------------------------------

End of [bmwuucdigest] digest(13 messages)
**********

Reply via email to