Sandra Pakin, and Ray Polivka, authored a number of good introductory &
reference books for APL.
Thanks for reminding me, Devon.

Google (bless its little cotton socks) was most helpful. There's an online
copy of the APL\360 Reference Manual here:

http://www.softwarepreservation.org/projects/apl/Books/APL360ReferenceManual
It lacks the lavish typographic aids we have today, but could serve as a
gold-standard for future work.

One could simply go through it and copy its style and layout for J – or
whatever variant "one" wishes to promote.

On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 1:25 PM, Devon McCormick <[email protected]> wrote:

> My favorite APL test was Sandra Pakin's reference manual: most APL
> primitives were defined abstractly on one page, then examples of usage were
> shown on the facing page.
>
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 2:52 PM, Ian Clark <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > So I'm not sure this helps you,
> >
> > Be sure it does.
> >
> > 1. I spent precious years receiving a stream of people who were not IT
> > professionals, and didn't want to be, but had IT rammed down their
> throats.
> > To wit: wives of IBM Hursley staff, who signed up for a Human Factors Lab
> > subject panel.
> > I briefed them, measured their IQ, then sat behind 1-way glass and
> watched
> > them perform on a simulated IT system developed specially for HF
> > experiments.
> > Then I watched and edited the video, audio and keystroke logs for hours
> > until I had their difficulties pinned out like butterflies.
> > We published a raft of papers in IJMMS and other applied psychology
> > journals. We got a mean reputation in those circles. We were the Apaches.
> > More usefully, we showed cocksure programmers how people (…intelligent
> > people -- we had proof of that) floundered and foundered when using their
> > wonderful software. Then we helped them up off the floor and stopped them
> > shooting themselves.
> >
> > A CIA torture chamber couldn't have done it better (we were equipped like
> > one, but without the funnels and buckets of water.)
> >
> > It develops an attitude. Yes – I too am aware that other people tend to
> be
> > different from me.
> >
> > 2. My Gilman and Rose had a red cover. I hated the book – oversized,
> > expensively produced pretentious twaddle. I believe it convinced a
> > generation that everything they said about APL was true. There was
> NOTHING
> > about writing and maintaining a distributable app in it. NOTHING about
> > solving meaningful problems to the vast majority of people. It was all
> > "here's this stellar galactic language of the gods. Bow down and grovel."
> >
> > By contrast I finger APWJ (At Play With J) and Cliff Reiter's book as
> polar
> > opposites. Those are clear-eyed, clear-voiced books that make toast of
> > formidable problems which actually look useful to know something about.
> If
> > there's one book that converted me to J, it was APWJ.
> >
> > (BTW they say that J-ottings is in the pipeline. I thrill to think of
> it.)
> >
> > 3. Yea…h. Concrete Math had things going for it. So did the books
> produced
> > by the I-APL project. Alvord and Thompson. I loved Gary Helzer's manual.
> I
> > could actually engage in Joy-in-the-Law over it.
> >
> > (I think I've said enough.)
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 7:11 PM, Raul Miller <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Eh... for me that was the J Dictionary, the J Concrete Math book and
> > > the J Source book. But that was for me...
> > >
> > > (Also, before that, I'd gotten quite a lot out of the Gilman and Rose
> > > book on APL (it had a red cover though - and when I search for it, I
> > > find a different version with a green cover - I do not know how
> > > significant the version differences are)).
> > >
> > > But also, I've learned long ago that other people tend to be different
> > > from me.
> > >
> > > So I'm not sure this helps you,
> > >
> > > --
> > > Raul
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 2:06 PM, Ian Clark <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > Thanks, Joe.
> > > >
> > > > I have Introductions to J coming out my ears. And before that,
> > > > Introductions to APL. IMFFHO they all miss the boat.
> > > > I think at long last I can now write one which touches the button
> for a
> > > > bona fide J know-nothing.
> > > >
> > > > Arrogance? Not a bit of it. I've simply looked at what other (more
> > > > popular/successful) language systems do.
> > > >
> > > > In a nutshell – what we don't.
> > > >
> > > > IF you have a treatment to-hand which you read when you genuinely
> knew
> > > > nothing about J
> > > > ANDIF it motivated you to invest your scarce time in engaging with
> the
> > > > language
> > > > THEN I'd like to see it.
> > > > ELSE.
> > > > * * * * *
> > > > This doesn't look good as I re-read it, I have to admit. But I'm too
> > old
> > > to
> > > > be polite if it means not being honest.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 6:04 PM, Joe Bogner <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Ah, I see. I thought to mention just in case the typical programmer
> > > domain
> > > >> vocabulary could be avoided or replaced with more J-like terms,
> which
> > > seems
> > > >> to intentionally have chosen simpler, more recognizable terms.  I
> > > presumed
> > > >> you were familiar with some of the existing material but I find it
> > > useful
> > > >> to refresh my memory on what's out there when starting something
> new.
> > > >>
> > > >> I'm curious, are you writing a "first-contact" text for J? I have
> read
> > > >> through several Introduction to J type blog posts or essays over the
> > > years
> > > >> that I can pass along if you're interested. There may be something
> to
> > > lift
> > > >> or compare to style-wise.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 11:42 AM, Ian Clark <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Sorry, Joe, I want "common programmer terms" for "platform,
> program,
> > > >> etc",
> > > >> > i.e. terms common to all programmers, not just J-ers.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Especially not J-ers!
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I tried looking up some of these terms in the Oxford Dictionary of
> > > >> English
> > > >> > (courtesy Apple) and I'm impressed. It seems it has authoritative
> > but
> > > >> > straightforward meanings under the subheading "Computing" for all
> > I've
> > > >> > tried
> > > >> > .
> > > >> >
> > > >> > But I'm still hoping to hear what ISO standard people on this list
> > > use,
> > > >> or
> > > >> > some standards body. I'm taking the baffled silence to mean that
> > > nobody
> > > >> has
> > > >> > ever used such a list. The fabled precision of IT professionals
> > > doesn't
> > > >> > extend to terminology, it seems.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Such lists exist. I've seen them – though only in German, and that
> > was
> > > >> > decades ago. Documenters need them for the purpose of translating
> > > >> manuals.
> > > >> > Though maybe the whole thing is still woolly, like it was in my
> day.
> > > An
> > > >> > Arab once told me he always used the English manual because he
> > > couldn't
> > > >> > make head or tail of the Arabic one.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Joe Bogner <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > I went back and looked at some of the existing material
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > This seems to be a good list of definitions with examples:
> > > >> > > http://www.jsoftware.com/help/primer/contents.htm
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > This text seems devoid of too many terms:
> > > >> > > http://www.jsoftware.com/books/pdf/easyj.pdf
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Of course, I'm not reading these with "beginner eyes" so both
> may
> > > still
> > > >> > > need to be unpacked more
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 7:28 AM, Ian Clark <
> [email protected]>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > It's absurdly difficult to write a good "first-contact" text
> > for J
> > > >> > > without
> > > >> > > > reference to a single accepted source of definitions like:
> > > platform,
> > > >> > > > program, app, script, variable, constant, function, array,
> > string,
> > > >> > > > character, number …
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Is there an ISO standard for common programmer terms (in
> > English)?
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > If the answer is: legion (…my first impression) – then is
> there
> > > one
> > > >> > that
> > > >> > > > stands out for you?
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > I have an operational need for a weblink to a good clear
> > published
> > > >> free
> > > >> > > > authoritative text. To avoid cluttering this thread, please
> > don't
> > > >> offer
> > > >> > > > your own definitions of the above terms here (although of
> course
> > > I'd
> > > >> be
> > > >> > > > frightfully interested to hear them one day.)
> > > >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> ----------
> > > >> > > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/
> > > >> forums.htm
> > > >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ----------
> > > >> > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/
> > > forums.htm
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ----------
> > > >> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/
> > > forums.htm
> > > >> >
> > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----------
> > > >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/
> > forums.htm
> > > >>
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> > > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/
> forums.htm
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Devon McCormick, CFA
>
> Quantitative Consultant
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to