Hi JB,

Please note that I opened a blocker [1] (working on it) and looks like we
have several other JIRAs marked for 2.5.0. So +1 for waiting for two weeks
(or till JIRAs are resolved or moved off the list).

Thanks,
Cham

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3991
[2]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.5.0%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:28 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> Due to the last work, I think it makes sense to try a release using
> Gradle. If it doesn't work smoothly, we will rollback to Maven, and
> maybe in that case, we should ask ourselves if Gradle is really a good
> alternative for now.
>
> I'm in vacation tomorrow morning for 2 weeks. I can cut the release
> tomorrow end of the morning (my time). But in the case we need some
> additional PR merges or we have some work in progress, I'm proposing to
> postpone 2.5.0 release for the end of this month (in two weeks). If
> someone is volunteer to tackle this release, please, let us know.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 06/04/2018 10:48, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Apache Beam 2.4.0 has been released on March 20th.
> >
> > According to our cycle of release (roughly 6 weeks), we should think
> about 2.5.0.
> >
> > I'm volunteer to tackle this release.
> >
> > I'm proposing the following items:
> >
> > 1. We start the Jira triage now, up to Tuesday
> > 2. I would like to cut the release on Tuesday night (Europe time)
> > 2bis. I think it's wiser to still use Maven for this release. Do you
> think we
> > will be ready to try a release with Gradle ?
> >
> > After this release, I would like a discussion about:
> > 1. Gradle release (if we release 2.5.0 with Maven)
> > 2. Isolate release cycle per Beam part. I think it would be interesting
> to have
> > different release cycle: SDKs, DSLs, Runners, IOs. That's another
> discussion, I
> > will start a thread about that.
> >
> > Thoughts ?
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
>

Reply via email to