+1 to what Ahmet said, I also think that it is important to take our time
given that we're in the gradle migration
process.
+1 to what JB said also: try gradle and fall back to maven in case of troubles.
Etienne
Le mercredi 11 avril 2018 à 13:35 -0700, Ahmet Altay a écrit :
> +1 to delaying 2 weeks.
>
> I think it will be prudent to wait in this case. There is too much in flux
> with Gradle migration currently and based
> on Scott's latest update I think we will be in a more stable state in 2
> weeks. Last Beam release date was 3/20 and our
> plan was to make a release every 6 weeks. Even if we start cutting a release
> in 2 weeks (~4/26), we will have more
> than a week to finish that release. Even if that is not enough time to finish
> a release it will put is in the
> proximity of the 5/5 target date. I prefer that option, to another potential
> release with Maven.
>
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 1:22 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Any hope the release is on central before the 30th?
> >
> I do not think this was the plan to begin with. The time between the previous
> release and 4/30 is less than 6 weeks.
>
> >
> > Le 11 avr. 2018 22:02, "Robert Bradshaw" <rober...@google.com> a écrit :
> > > +1 to keeping up the regular release cycle, but I don't think it makes
> > > sense to cut until we're ready to actively
> > > work on the release. A cut date two weeks from now seems fine (unless
> > > someone else is volunteering to do it this
> > > time around).
> > >
> > > That being said, a dry run using gradle now may make a lot of sense,
> > > giving us a couple of weeks to iron out the
> > > kinks, if any.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:58 PM Chamikara Jayalath
> > > <chamik...@google.com> wrote:
> > > > Hi JB,
> > > >
> > > > Please note that I opened a blocker [1] (working on it) and looks like
> > > > we have several other JIRAs marked for
> > > > 2.5.0. So +1 for waiting for two weeks (or till JIRAs are resolved or
> > > > moved off the list).
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Cham
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3991
> > > > [2]
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%
> > > > 20fixVersion%20%3D%202.5.0%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:28 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > > > <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> > > > > Hi guys,
> > > > >
> > > > > Due to the last work, I think it makes sense to try a release using
> > > > > Gradle. If it doesn't work smoothly, we will rollback to Maven, and
> > > > > maybe in that case, we should ask ourselves if Gradle is really a
> > > > > good
> > > > > alternative for now.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm in vacation tomorrow morning for 2 weeks. I can cut the release
> > > > > tomorrow end of the morning (my time). But in the case we need some
> > > > > additional PR merges or we have some work in progress, I'm proposing
> > > > > to
> > > > > postpone 2.5.0 release for the end of this month (in two weeks). If
> > > > > someone is volunteer to tackle this release, please, let us know.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > > JB
> > > > >
> > > > > On 06/04/2018 10:48, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > > > > > Hi guys,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Apache Beam 2.4.0 has been released on March 20th.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > According to our cycle of release (roughly 6 weeks), we should
> > > > > > think about 2.5.0.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm volunteer to tackle this release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm proposing the following items:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1. We start the Jira triage now, up to Tuesday
> > > > > > 2. I would like to cut the release on Tuesday night (Europe time)
> > > > > > 2bis. I think it's wiser to still use Maven for this release. Do
> > > > > > you think we
> > > > > > will be ready to try a release with Gradle ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > After this release, I would like a discussion about:
> > > > > > 1. Gradle release (if we release 2.5.0 with Maven)
> > > > > > 2. Isolate release cycle per Beam part. I think it would be
> > > > > > interesting to have
> > > > > > different release cycle: SDKs, DSLs, Runners, IOs. That's another
> > > > > > discussion, I
> > > > > > will start a thread about that.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thoughts ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > JB
> > > > > >
> > > > >
