I can't believe you're being so stubborn about something so minor Jacques, it seems like very strange behavior to me. For what it's worth as a native English speaker, reading a commit message written in present-tense feels very strange to me. I'm looking at a history and reading something as though it is current, it doesn't feel logical.
Regards Scott On 22 September 2016 at 19:36, Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com > wrote: > Jacopo, > > I saw you answered on Confluence where I 1st asked > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/OFBiz+ > commit+message+template?focusedCommentId=65871637#comment-65871637 > > Now, I understand that we need to pick a word, but why not being more > flexible, similarly at what does GitHub https://help.github.com/articl > es/closing-issues-via-commit-messages/ ? > > I already suggested in previous threads that I could help if the process > Michael uses to create the blog monthly report needs to be adapted. > In relation, I also created in the "Wiki page for the "monthly Jira issues > list" creation in the blog" thread, without any answers so far :/ > > Thanks > > Jacques > > > Le 22/09/2016 à 08:45, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : > >> Hi Jacopo, >> >> What is the logical behind this? It's not the first time I ask and I'd >> really like to have a clarification. >> >> We have "Fix for" and "Documentation". Why not "Fixed" and "Documented"? >> >> Thanks >> >> Jacques >> >> Le 21/09/2016 à 19:09, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : >> >>> I have changed it to "Reverted" for consistency reasons. >>> >>> Jacopo >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >>> jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: >>> >>> Done >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> >>>> Le 18/09/2016 à 11:19, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> In some cases we need to revert a commit done for a Jira after we >>>>> discover it causes an issue. We have not yet other means that using >>>>> the fix >>>>> word. >>>>> I suggest we put in the "Reverts" (or "Revert for" or "Reverted" as it >>>>> please you) word in the commit template for this reason. >>>>> Because it's a different thing than really fixing the initial issue >>>>> reported in the Jira but it's sill related to it >>>>> >>>>> What do you think? >>>>> >>>>> Jacques >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >
