I have answered you in the Wiki but quoting here for everyone's convenience:
"Jacques, for me it is a done deal! As you suggests we could change: - Documentation --> Documented - Fix for --> Fixed And the final list of verbs will be: [Implemented|Improved|Fixed|Completed|Documented|Reverted] If there are no objections (as I hope) we will finally have a template that will be adopted by all committers (and also by Jacques)!" On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Hi Jacopo, > > What is the logical behind this? It's not the first time I ask and I'd > really like to have a clarification. > > We have "Fix for" and "Documentation". Why not "Fixed" and "Documented"? > > Thanks > > Jacques > > > Le 21/09/2016 à 19:09, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : > >> I have changed it to "Reverted" for consistency reasons. >> >> Jacopo >> >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >> jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: >> >> Done >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> >>> Le 18/09/2016 à 11:19, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : >>> >>> Hi, >>>> >>>> In some cases we need to revert a commit done for a Jira after we >>>> discover it causes an issue. We have not yet other means that using the >>>> fix >>>> word. >>>> I suggest we put in the "Reverts" (or "Revert for" or "Reverted" as it >>>> please you) word in the commit template for this reason. >>>> Because it's a different thing than really fixing the initial issue >>>> reported in the Jira but it's sill related to it >>>> >>>> What do you think? >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >
