I saw you answered on Confluence where I 1st asked https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/OFBiz+commit+message+template?focusedCommentId=65871637#comment-65871637

Now, I understand that we need to pick a word, but why not being more flexible, similarly at what does GitHub https://help.github.com/articles/closing-issues-via-commit-messages/ ?

I already suggested in previous threads that I could help if the process 
Michael uses to create the blog monthly report needs to be adapted.
In relation, I also created in the "Wiki page for the "monthly Jira issues list" 
creation in the blog" thread, without any answers so far :/



Le 22/09/2016 à 08:45, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi Jacopo,

What is the logical behind this? It's not the first time I ask and I'd really 
like to have a clarification.

We have "Fix for" and "Documentation". Why not "Fixed" and "Documented"?



Le 21/09/2016 à 19:09, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
I have changed it to "Reverted" for consistency reasons.


On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:



Le 18/09/2016 à 11:19, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :


In some cases we need to revert a commit done for a Jira after we
discover it causes an issue. We have not yet other means that using the fix
I suggest we put in the "Reverts" (or "Revert for" or "Reverted" as it
please you) word in the commit template for this reason.
Because it's a different thing than really fixing the initial issue
reported in the Jira but it's sill related to it

What do you think?


Reply via email to