On 10/27/06, Dave Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I could understand running a DFB session in X (for development as stated by > Lloyd), but why would someone want to run an X session on top of a DFB > session? Isn't that loading two graphical "interfaces" ontop of one > another? Why wouldn't someone just load one or the other?
I know of a few users who run their desktop using DirectFB but might want to run an occasional X application on it (I'm thinking of you, Denis Kropp :) _______________________________________________ directfb-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-users
