Ben Combee schrieb: > On 10/27/06, Dave Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I could understand running a DFB session in X (for development as stated by >> Lloyd), but why would someone want to run an X session on top of a DFB >> session? Isn't that loading two graphical "interfaces" ontop of one >> another? Why wouldn't someone just load one or the other? > > I know of a few users who run their desktop using DirectFB but might > want to run an occasional X application on it (I'm thinking of you, > Denis Kropp :)
It's slightly different. I'm running Gnome (Panel), Thunderbird, FireFox, SlickEdit, XMMS and many DFBTerms most of the time. Other DirectFB applications like df_cpuload are also running in the same session, all the time. You see those squares on the screenshots :) -- Best regards, Denis Oliver Kropp .------------------------------------------. | DirectFB - Hardware accelerated graphics | | http://www.directfb.org/ | "------------------------------------------" _______________________________________________ directfb-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-users
