Right now I think we're using more like the maximum of power: 3 big
and 3 small AC units, and 4 fridges running much more than usual (hard
to guess - 3x, 5x?) to cool themselves down when it was so hot in the
space. In the winter we'd only be using heaters, and with
re-distribution of the server/elec room heat I think we'd find
ourselves pretty warm.


On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Michael Loney <[email protected]> wrote:
>      Not to be a stick in the mud...
>
>      TL;DR
>           Spend in g money on a bill that is not ours is a bad move.
>           This definitely needs a vote to pass.
>           The gas bill has not verified yet. It may be more than we budgeted
> for.
>
>       When we signed the lease the landlord was aware that we would be using
> some average amount power and included it in the lease anyway. While being
> the nice people we are, if we start paying an extra $250 /mo for rent it
> will start to affect everything we do, renovations, events, projects, etc.
> The lease is only for 3 years and if we start paying now then if we renew
> the rent will be much higher and the power will not be included anymore. We
> have all done the calculations to death and determined we are not using 'too
> much' power but we are closer to the average for the floor area. Remco is
> not a new company, they probably have charts of typical power usage based on
> floor space vs function ( office, warehouse, etc) and they still convinced
> Marvin to sign it.
>
>      If they did not do their homework on the deal then why should we be
> paying for their mistake? I agree with reducing our usage as best we can by
> putting timers on the A/C units to reduce the ON time but I think the lights
> on Assent Works side have to be on for the insurance policy to be in place
> (Mike please correct me if I am wrong) Currently we are using a minimum of
> power and in the winter as the space gets more active, the power bill will
> simply increase and we will be back at the table with the same problem
> again. Also we need to anticipate the gas bill in the coming months before
> promising any other payments.
>
>      I know we have the 6 month clause and it was decided not to put any
> provisos in place to prevent this exact thing from happening. They have all
> the power in this situation. I don't want to see us lose the space over this
> ( I put a lot of blood sweat and tears into it! ) But bending to the
> landlord over a problem that is 100% on them ( and Remco ) will just keep us
> on the short end of the stick for at least the next 3 years.
>
>      I know time is short before the meeting with the landlord but I don't
> think we can simply have an quick executive decision on this one as it is
> not an emergency. Agreeing to pay more will extend our time to completion on
> renovations for sure and set a bad precedence for future situations.
>
>      All that said, I know Assent Works has much, much more invested than we
> do and to maintain a partnership with them we need to be supportive.
>
> G Mike
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Jay Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Sounds good. $250, or 60% of the bill, is a sane maximum in my opinion. If
>> 60% of our bill ever turns out to be more than $250, we're doing something
>> wrong.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Justin Lacko <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> We will be arguing for a percentage. $250 extra is the max we will go
>>> if it comes to it.
>>>
>>> This is an excellent observation and will work well in the
>>> discussions. Yes, 800-850 is combined.
>>>
>>> On 24 August 2012 15:34, Jay Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > We can afford it.
>>> >
>>> > Am I correct in assuming $800-$850/mo is skullspace's and assentworks's
>>> > combined charge?
>>> > Have you and Mike considered offering to pay a percentage of the bill
>>> > rather
>>> > than a fixed rate?
>>> >
>>> > If my assumptions are correct, we're now offering to pay 60% of our
>>> > usage.
>>> > If we go through with our 1/3 reduction plans, we will be paying 90% of
>>> > the
>>> > bill. This seems high.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Andrew Orr <[email protected]>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> How many members do we even have? I know there's been a few people who
>>> >> have left recently. Can we even afford this with our current
>>> >> membership and
>>> >> the budget we worked out?
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Ron <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I personally have no problem with you making the offer, provided Jay
>>> >>> says it's a reasonable commitment financially.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Ron
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On 2012-08-24 14:24, Justin Lacko wrote:
>>> >>> > This is an important follow-up to earlier discussions involving the
>>> >>> > cost of electrical on our floor.
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > As you may know, Mike Legary and myself are meeting with Marvin,
>>> >>> > our
>>> >>> > landlord on Tuesday afternoon to discuss the electrical bills.
>>> >>> > Today I
>>> >>> > received the most recent electrical bill (we are billed monthly)
>>> >>> > which
>>> >>> > came in at around $1100. This bill includes cre8ery's usage, plus
>>> >>> > public building usage (garage lights, etc). Today Mike Legary also
>>> >>> > had
>>> >>> > an electrician come and accurately measure our power usage on the
>>> >>> > floor. The results are that with AW running its lights always and
>>> >>> > regular use of their equipment, they are consuming roughly the same
>>> >>> > amount of electricity as SkullSpace is, which is 36A per group (36A
>>> >>> > SkSp, 36A AW). Our rough estimated electrical bills has been
>>> >>> > calculated at $800-$850/mo. at peak use.
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > What all of this means in the simplest terms is that the landlord
>>> >>> > is
>>> >>> > losing money on our lease, which is not good. This would very
>>> >>> > easily
>>> >>> > be a good reason to terminate our lease. Mike Legary estimated the
>>> >>> > landlord currently making $0.50/sq. ft. on the space, and with
>>> >>> > taxes
>>> >>> > at $0.70/sq. ft., which results in negative profit. In the upcoming
>>> >>> > meeting, the landlord will almost certainly be asking for a
>>> >>> > reduction
>>> >>> > of our usage.
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > The suggestion that we will be making on Tuesday's meeting is that
>>> >>> > SkSp & AW will pay for a certain portion of the electrical in order
>>> >>> > to
>>> >>> > alleviate the problem of the landlord losing money. Don't forget
>>> >>> > that
>>> >>> > our lease has a 6-month clause which means that the landlord could
>>> >>> > terminate on us at any time. Our max offered contribution towards
>>> >>> > the
>>> >>> > electrical bill will be $250/mo. per group, meaning a $500
>>> >>> > contribution from the floor. Again, we are doing this so that we
>>> >>> > appear as the "good guys" who are recognising that the landlord is
>>> >>> > not
>>> >>> > making money on us, and primarily we are doing this so that we
>>> >>> > don't
>>> >>> > lose our lease. AssentWorks has already agreed to this amount, and
>>> >>> > we
>>> >>> > need SkullSpace to be on board by Monday so that we can take this
>>> >>> > offer to the meeting on Tuesday. If SkullSpace does not agree to
>>> >>> > this
>>> >>> > and AssentWorks does, not only will it look bad on our part when
>>> >>> > talking to the landlord, but it will almost certainly result in the
>>> >>> > loss of our lease. The other added part to this agreement is for
>>> >>> > both
>>> >>> > sides to reduce electrical consumption by 1/3 (the amount we will
>>> >>> > bring to the table). This isn't as hard as it sounds; we have old
>>> >>> > lighting taking up double the power of new lights; and lighting
>>> >>> > could
>>> >>> > be put on motion sensors as AssentWorks will be doing. We could
>>> >>> > also
>>> >>> > properly ventilate our server room which will result in reduced
>>> >>> > workload on the machines and save us money.
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > Unfortunately this issue is not one that can wait for a formal
>>> >>> > meeting
>>> >>> > vote by members; Mike Legary and I need to go into this as being on
>>> >>> > the same page in order to present a concerted response. Part of our
>>> >>> > discussions will also focus on increased electrical due to the
>>> >>> > landlord's decision to install space heaters, bad windows, etc.
>>> >>> > etc.
>>> >>> > Mike and I will work hard for SkSp and AW to bargain as best as we
>>> >>> > can
>>> >>> > in this process and also ensure that our upcoming electrical plans
>>> >>> > do
>>> >>> > not render these discussions moot.
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > I will try my best to answer all questions pertaining to this as
>>> >>> > best
>>> >>> > as I can.
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > Thanks,
>>> >>> > Justin
>>> >>> > _______________________________________________
>>> >>> > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>> >>> > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>> >>> > Archive:
>>> >>> > https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>> >>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>> >>> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>> >> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>> >> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>> > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>> > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
_______________________________________________
SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/

Reply via email to