I meant more in usage for people being there, lights, computers, projector
and extra heating based on the doors being open more often. I know we will
not be using the AC units but there may be more usage of everything else.

G Mike

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Colin Stanners <[email protected]> wrote:

> Right now I think we're using more like the maximum of power: 3 big
> and 3 small AC units, and 4 fridges running much more than usual (hard
> to guess - 3x, 5x?) to cool themselves down when it was so hot in the
> space. In the winter we'd only be using heaters, and with
> re-distribution of the server/elec room heat I think we'd find
> ourselves pretty warm.
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Michael Loney <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >      Not to be a stick in the mud...
> >
> >      TL;DR
> >           Spend in g money on a bill that is not ours is a bad move.
> >           This definitely needs a vote to pass.
> >           The gas bill has not verified yet. It may be more than we
> budgeted
> > for.
> >
> >       When we signed the lease the landlord was aware that we would be
> using
> > some average amount power and included it in the lease anyway. While
> being
> > the nice people we are, if we start paying an extra $250 /mo for rent it
> > will start to affect everything we do, renovations, events, projects,
> etc.
> > The lease is only for 3 years and if we start paying now then if we renew
> > the rent will be much higher and the power will not be included anymore.
> We
> > have all done the calculations to death and determined we are not using
> 'too
> > much' power but we are closer to the average for the floor area. Remco is
> > not a new company, they probably have charts of typical power usage
> based on
> > floor space vs function ( office, warehouse, etc) and they still
> convinced
> > Marvin to sign it.
> >
> >      If they did not do their homework on the deal then why should we be
> > paying for their mistake? I agree with reducing our usage as best we can
> by
> > putting timers on the A/C units to reduce the ON time but I think the
> lights
> > on Assent Works side have to be on for the insurance policy to be in
> place
> > (Mike please correct me if I am wrong) Currently we are using a minimum
> of
> > power and in the winter as the space gets more active, the power bill
> will
> > simply increase and we will be back at the table with the same problem
> > again. Also we need to anticipate the gas bill in the coming months
> before
> > promising any other payments.
> >
> >      I know we have the 6 month clause and it was decided not to put any
> > provisos in place to prevent this exact thing from happening. They have
> all
> > the power in this situation. I don't want to see us lose the space over
> this
> > ( I put a lot of blood sweat and tears into it! ) But bending to the
> > landlord over a problem that is 100% on them ( and Remco ) will just
> keep us
> > on the short end of the stick for at least the next 3 years.
> >
> >      I know time is short before the meeting with the landlord but I
> don't
> > think we can simply have an quick executive decision on this one as it is
> > not an emergency. Agreeing to pay more will extend our time to
> completion on
> > renovations for sure and set a bad precedence for future situations.
> >
> >      All that said, I know Assent Works has much, much more invested
> than we
> > do and to maintain a partnership with them we need to be supportive.
> >
> > G Mike
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Jay Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Sounds good. $250, or 60% of the bill, is a sane maximum in my opinion.
> If
> >> 60% of our bill ever turns out to be more than $250, we're doing
> something
> >> wrong.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Justin Lacko <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> We will be arguing for a percentage. $250 extra is the max we will go
> >>> if it comes to it.
> >>>
> >>> This is an excellent observation and will work well in the
> >>> discussions. Yes, 800-850 is combined.
> >>>
> >>> On 24 August 2012 15:34, Jay Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> > We can afford it.
> >>> >
> >>> > Am I correct in assuming $800-$850/mo is skullspace's and
> assentworks's
> >>> > combined charge?
> >>> > Have you and Mike considered offering to pay a percentage of the bill
> >>> > rather
> >>> > than a fixed rate?
> >>> >
> >>> > If my assumptions are correct, we're now offering to pay 60% of our
> >>> > usage.
> >>> > If we go through with our 1/3 reduction plans, we will be paying 90%
> of
> >>> > the
> >>> > bill. This seems high.
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Andrew Orr <[email protected]>
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> How many members do we even have? I know there's been a few people
> who
> >>> >> have left recently. Can we even afford this with our current
> >>> >> membership and
> >>> >> the budget we worked out?
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Ron <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> I personally have no problem with you making the offer, provided
> Jay
> >>> >>> says it's a reasonable commitment financially.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Ron
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> On 2012-08-24 14:24, Justin Lacko wrote:
> >>> >>> > This is an important follow-up to earlier discussions involving
> the
> >>> >>> > cost of electrical on our floor.
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > As you may know, Mike Legary and myself are meeting with Marvin,
> >>> >>> > our
> >>> >>> > landlord on Tuesday afternoon to discuss the electrical bills.
> >>> >>> > Today I
> >>> >>> > received the most recent electrical bill (we are billed monthly)
> >>> >>> > which
> >>> >>> > came in at around $1100. This bill includes cre8ery's usage, plus
> >>> >>> > public building usage (garage lights, etc). Today Mike Legary
> also
> >>> >>> > had
> >>> >>> > an electrician come and accurately measure our power usage on the
> >>> >>> > floor. The results are that with AW running its lights always and
> >>> >>> > regular use of their equipment, they are consuming roughly the
> same
> >>> >>> > amount of electricity as SkullSpace is, which is 36A per group
> (36A
> >>> >>> > SkSp, 36A AW). Our rough estimated electrical bills has been
> >>> >>> > calculated at $800-$850/mo. at peak use.
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > What all of this means in the simplest terms is that the landlord
> >>> >>> > is
> >>> >>> > losing money on our lease, which is not good. This would very
> >>> >>> > easily
> >>> >>> > be a good reason to terminate our lease. Mike Legary estimated
> the
> >>> >>> > landlord currently making $0.50/sq. ft. on the space, and with
> >>> >>> > taxes
> >>> >>> > at $0.70/sq. ft., which results in negative profit. In the
> upcoming
> >>> >>> > meeting, the landlord will almost certainly be asking for a
> >>> >>> > reduction
> >>> >>> > of our usage.
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > The suggestion that we will be making on Tuesday's meeting is
> that
> >>> >>> > SkSp & AW will pay for a certain portion of the electrical in
> order
> >>> >>> > to
> >>> >>> > alleviate the problem of the landlord losing money. Don't forget
> >>> >>> > that
> >>> >>> > our lease has a 6-month clause which means that the landlord
> could
> >>> >>> > terminate on us at any time. Our max offered contribution towards
> >>> >>> > the
> >>> >>> > electrical bill will be $250/mo. per group, meaning a $500
> >>> >>> > contribution from the floor. Again, we are doing this so that we
> >>> >>> > appear as the "good guys" who are recognising that the landlord
> is
> >>> >>> > not
> >>> >>> > making money on us, and primarily we are doing this so that we
> >>> >>> > don't
> >>> >>> > lose our lease. AssentWorks has already agreed to this amount,
> and
> >>> >>> > we
> >>> >>> > need SkullSpace to be on board by Monday so that we can take this
> >>> >>> > offer to the meeting on Tuesday. If SkullSpace does not agree to
> >>> >>> > this
> >>> >>> > and AssentWorks does, not only will it look bad on our part when
> >>> >>> > talking to the landlord, but it will almost certainly result in
> the
> >>> >>> > loss of our lease. The other added part to this agreement is for
> >>> >>> > both
> >>> >>> > sides to reduce electrical consumption by 1/3 (the amount we will
> >>> >>> > bring to the table). This isn't as hard as it sounds; we have old
> >>> >>> > lighting taking up double the power of new lights; and lighting
> >>> >>> > could
> >>> >>> > be put on motion sensors as AssentWorks will be doing. We could
> >>> >>> > also
> >>> >>> > properly ventilate our server room which will result in reduced
> >>> >>> > workload on the machines and save us money.
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > Unfortunately this issue is not one that can wait for a formal
> >>> >>> > meeting
> >>> >>> > vote by members; Mike Legary and I need to go into this as being
> on
> >>> >>> > the same page in order to present a concerted response. Part of
> our
> >>> >>> > discussions will also focus on increased electrical due to the
> >>> >>> > landlord's decision to install space heaters, bad windows, etc.
> >>> >>> > etc.
> >>> >>> > Mike and I will work hard for SkSp and AW to bargain as best as
> we
> >>> >>> > can
> >>> >>> > in this process and also ensure that our upcoming electrical
> plans
> >>> >>> > do
> >>> >>> > not render these discussions moot.
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > I will try my best to answer all questions pertaining to this as
> >>> >>> > best
> >>> >>> > as I can.
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > Thanks,
> >>> >>> > Justin
> >>> >>> > _______________________________________________
> >>> >>> > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> >>> >>> > Help:
> http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> >>> >>> > Archive:
> >>> >>> > https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
> >>> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> >>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> >>> >>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> >>> >>> Archive:
> https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> _______________________________________________
> >>> >> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> >>> >> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> >>> >> Archive:
> https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > _______________________________________________
> >>> > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> >>> > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> >>> > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> >>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> >>> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> >> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> >> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
> _______________________________________________
> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>
_______________________________________________
SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/

Reply via email to