On Fri, 15 Jun 2001 11:32:29 -0400 (EDT), you wrote: > the infernal >focus design of the 28-135 results in a close focus distance Hmm - not sure how close I'd want to get to anything down there! ;-) Ken Durling Website http://home.earthlink.net/~kdurling/ Alternate e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- EOS 500D vs extension tube(s) Collyer Young
- Re: EOS 500D vs extension tube(s) Julian Loke
- Re: EOS 500D vs extension tube(s) Collyer Young
- Re: EOS 500D vs extension tube(s) Robert Meier
- Re: EOS 500D vs extension tube(s) Vesa Perala
- Re: EOS 500D vs extension tube(s) jul . loke
- Re: EOS 500D vs extension tube(s) Ken Durling
- Re: EOS 500D vs extension tube(s) kwulff
- Re: EOS 500D vs extension tube(s) Syed Asad Ali Zaidi
- Re: EOS 500D vs extension tube(s) Julian Loke
- Re: EOS 500D vs extension tube(s) Thomas Bantel
- Re: EOS 500D vs extension tube(s) Collyer Young
- Re: EOS 500D vs extension tube(s) Julian Loke
- Re: EOS 500D vs extension tube(s) Collyer Young
- EOS AF capability Julian Loke
