>>I'm not kidding. I understand your concern
> It's also statistically more likely if you're a male between 18-25...

Statistics govern groups. I am an individual. I am 42. As was my father
when I was born. What an interesting coincidence. Not.

> You did post a testable prediction though -- that Gene Ray of Time Cube
> will die today. Let's say that "today" means within 24 hours of your post.


> If Gene Ray does die today, that would be reasonable evidence that you're
> onto *something* here, but I would want to see three predictions like that
> in a row to be sure.

Not only do I predict Gene Ray's death, but I can show you the
relationship between Time Cube and string theory! I am not making this up.
Why would I make this up?

> If he doesn't die today, would you accept that as
> evidence that you have not developed superpowers of super understanding?

I'm not claiming super powers of super understanding. In fact, it is pure
random luck that I happen to be in this position. I think.

> If Gene Ray doesn't die, the rational thing to do will be to accept your
> failure and calmly move on, rather than come up with some complex reason
> to rationalize it.

It wasn't some kind of ironclad guarantee. It was just a prediction. Based
on intuition, mainly.
Mark Buda <her...@acm.org>
I get my monkeys for nothing and my chimps for free.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to