2011/2/14 1Z <peterdjo...@yahoo.com>

>
>
> On Feb 14, 2:52 pm, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:
> > On 14 Feb 2011, at 13:35, 1Z wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Feb 14, 8:47 am, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:
> > >> Do you believe that Goldbach conjecture is either true or false? If
> > >> you agree with this, then you accept arithmetical realism, which is
> > >> enough for the comp consequences.,
> >
> > > Nope. Bivalence can be accepted as a formal rule and therefore
> > > not as a claim that some set of objects either exist or don't.
> >
> > That's my point.
>
> Such a formal claim cannot support the conclusion that
> I am an immaterial dreaming machine.
>
> >
> > >> Do you believe that Church thesis makes sense? That is enough to say
> > >> that you believe in the 'arithmetical platonia'
> >
> > > Not at all.
> >
> > OK. This means that you are using "arithmetical platonia" in a sense
> > which is not relevant for the reasoning.
> > If you accept CT, there should be no problem with the reasoning at all.
>
> I accept CT and reject Platonism, and thus the reasoning does not go
> through.
>
> > >> . People needs to be
> > >> ultrafinitist to reject the arithmetical platonia.
> >
> > > No, they just need to be anti realist.
> >
> > Same remark.
>
> Nope. Finitists think 7 exists., anti realists think it doesn't.
>
> > >> Personnaly I am a bit skeptical on set realism, because it is hard to
> > >> define it, but for the numbers I have never met people who are not
> > >> realist about them.
> >
> > > Oh come on. How can you say that after I just told
> > > you 7 doesn't exist.
> >
> > You contradict your self,
>
> No I don't. How many times have I explained that
> mathematical existence claims are true in a fictive
> sense that doesn't imply real existence
>

You still did not define what is real existence... that it kicks back is not
an acceptable definition.

When you're dead you don't exist ? If yes what does it means to exist at all
?

>
> >unless you mean that seven is not made of
> > matter. In which case comp nothing exists.
>
> What does "comp nothing exists" mean?
>
> > >> Even to say "I am not arithmetical realist" is
> > >> enough to be an arithmetical realist
> >
> > > Nonsense.
> >
> > Probable, given your rather inappropriate sense of metaphysical
> > realism in mathematics.
>
> I am  not a realist about maths. You must be because you exist
> and you think you are a  number
>
> > >> . A real anti-ariothmetical
> > >> realist cannot even spaeak about arithmetical realism. You need to be
> > >> an arithmetical realist to make sense of denying it.
> >
> > > Like the old canard that to deny God is to accept God? Naah. Meaning
> > > is not
> > > just reference.
> >
> > A reasoning is valid, or not valid.
>
> A true conclusion requires soundness as well as validity
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
>
>


-- 
All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

Reply via email to