On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:55 PM, 1Z <peterdjo...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > Assume both matter and number relations exist.  With comp, the existence
> of
> > number relations explains the existence of matter, but the existence of
> > matter does not explain the existence of number relations.
> Yes it does. Any number relation  that has ever been grasped by
> anybody exists in their mind, and therefore in their brain. And as
> for the ungrasped ones...so what? It can make no difference
> if they are there or not.
Perhaps if those "ungrasped ones" did not exist then we might not exist.  It
is premature to say their existence does not make a difference to us.

I think may also be incorrect to say we need to grasp numbers or their
relations for them to matter.  Consider this example: I generate a large
random number X, with no obvious factors (I think it is prime), but when I
compute (y^(X - 1)) and divide by X (where y is not a multiple of X), I find
the remainder is not 1.  This means X is not prime: it has factors other
than 1 and X, but I haven't grasped what those factors are.  Nor is there
any efficient method for finding out what they are.

Now the existence of these ungrasped numbers does make a difference.  If I
attempted to build an RSA key using X and another legitimately prime number
(instead of two prime numbers), then the encryption won't work properly.  I
won't be able to determine a private key because I don't know all the

What would you say about the existence of the factors of X?  Do they
actually exist, despite that no one has any clue what they are?  And does
their existence (despite being unknown) matter?


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to