On 2/10/2012 7:25 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2012/2/10 Craig Weinberg <whatsons...@gmail.com
On Feb 10, 4:06 am, Quentin Anciaux <allco...@gmail.com
> 2012/2/9 Craig Weinberg <whatsons...@gmail.com
> > On Feb 9, 9:49 am, Quentin Anciaux <allco...@gmail.com
> > > 2012/2/9 Craig Weinberg <whatsons...@gmail.com
> > > > > > How does a gear or lever have an opinion?
> > > > > The problems with gears and levers is dumbness.
> > > > Does putting a billion gears and levers together in an
> > > > make them less dumb? Does it start having opinions at some
> > > Does putting a billions neurons together in an arrangement
make them less
> > > dumb ? Does it start having opinions at some point ?
> > No, because neurons are living organisms in the first place, not
> > gears.
> At which point does it start having an opinions ?
At every point when it is alive.
That's not true, does a single neuron has an opinion ? two ? a thousand ?
We may not call them opinions
Don't switch subject.
we use that word to refer to an entire human being's experience, but
the point is that being a living cell makes it capable of having
different capacities than it does as a dead cell.
Yes and so what ? a dead cell *does not* behave like a living cell,
When it is dead,
there is no biological sense going on, only chemical detection-
reaction, which is time reversible. Biological sense isn't time
> Why simulated neurons
> couldn't have opinions at that same point ? Vitalism ?
No, because there is no such thing as absolute simulation,
There is no need for an "absolute" simulation... what do you mean by
only imitation. Simulation is an imitation
no, simulation is not imitation.
designed to invite us to
mistake it for genuine - which is adequate for things we don't care
about much, but awareness cannot be a mistake. It is the absolute
primary orientation, so it cannot ever be substituted. If you make
synthetic neurons which are very close to natural neurons on every
level, then you have a better chance of coming close enough that the
resulting organism is very similar to the original. A simulation which
is not made of something that forms a cell by itself (an actual cell,
not a virtual sculpture of a cell) probably has no possibility of
graduating from time reversible detection-reaction to other categories
of sense, feeling, awareness, perception, and consciousness, just as a
A CGI picture *is a picture* not a simulation.
of a neuron has no chance of producing milliliters of
actual serotonin, acetylcholine, glutamate,etc.
Is it needed for consciousness ? why ?
How would your reasoning work for a virus? Is it "alive"? I think
that the notion of "being alive" is not a property of the parts but of
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at