On 4/5/2012 12:39 PM, David Nyman wrote:
I confess this smells to me like the wrong sort of theory.  On the
other hand, if comp is true the story can be somewhat more subtle.
Comp + consciousness (the "internal view" of arithmetical truth)
implies an infinity of possible histories, in which natural selection,
of features advantageous to macroscopic entities inhabiting a
macroscopic environment, is a particularly consistent strand.

I think that's the story even if comp is false.

It also
entails parallel strands of "evolutionary history" - i.e. at the level
of wave function - which need make no reference to any such macro
features but nonetheless imply the same gross distributions of matter.

Are you contemplating consciousness as a kind of equivalence relation that picks out the different branches of Everett's MWI, i.e. solves the basis problem of decoherence? That would seem to make every quasi-classical object conscious.

  But such a schema does entail a "causal" role for consciousness, as
the unique integrator of discontinuous subjective perspectives,

To refer to 'subjective' perspectives seems to already assume consciousness.


but at
a very different logical level than that of "physical causation" (i.e.
the reductive structural relation between states).


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to