On 05 Jul 2012, at 22:14, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/5/2012 11:39 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
OK. But this happens because my computational state in Helsinki has
been duplicated, and the changes you talk about is the experience
of self-localization. This is a rephrasing which does not suppress
in any way the fact that in Helsinki I am uncertain about the
experience I will feel next.
But that uncertainty could exist without the duplication - just the
uncertainty of which city you would be teleported to. But in the
duplication case, when you say, "I am uncertain about the experience
I will feel next." the second "I", the "I" of the future, has an
ambiguous reference. The uncertainty is in the ambiguity of this
reference.
No problem with this. AUDA explains indeed why the 1-I is equivocating/
ambiguous. Comp makes this into an indeterminacy of outcome. So, this
does not change the fact that if comp is true, then physics is reduce
to arithmetic.
Exactly the same ambiguousness is applied in Everett.
Bruno
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
