String theory explains indirect monadic perception as the instantaneous mapping of the entire universe outside the monad to its interior in a r-> 1/r mapping, first derived by Brian Green in a two-dimensional approximation.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:17 AM, Roger Clough <rclo...@verizon.net> wrote: > Hi Stephen P. King (and Richard) > > That particles (strings) can "see" the universe the universe is different > from monadic (indirect) perception because monadic perception > does not occur by photons, distances are not involved, > and so is instantaneous. Monadic perception is also somewhat > imperfect (near-sighted and somewhat dim) in a practical sense, > whereas photons transmit information slower but perfectly. > > This is a difficulty of a type I feared but didn't resolve when I > simply claimed that strings are monads. Obviously if the universe is > made up entirely of strings and entirely of monads there is likely some > corresponce between the two, but it is not simply equivalence. > > > Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net > 8/22/2012 > Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so > everything could function." > > ----- Receiving the following content ----- > *From:* Stephen P. King <stephe...@charter.net> > *Receiver:* everything-list <everything-list@googlegroups.com> > *Time:* 2012-08-21, 08:11:08 > *Subject:* Re: How Leibniz solved the mind-body problem > > On 8/21/2012 8:07 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote: > > Roger, > > According to string theory the monads do not "only see the external world > through the eyes of the supreme monad > (or CPU)". Rather in string theory each individual, discrete, and distinct > monad sees the entire universe instantly but without complete resolution. > However integration of information allows for improved resolution. > > > Hi Richard, > > This is the same thing that Roger and I are claiming. > > > In string theory there is no supreme monad. Rather any such thing must be > an intergrated or collective effect of many monads. Leibniz was not > entirely correct. But he got the most important characteristic, that monads > are so tiny as to be invisible. And that monads control the universe via > the laws and constants of nature. > > > The idea of the supreme is a figure of speech... We can approximate > the supreme with limits... > > > Also there is no evidence in string theory that monads come in 3 types. > But the fact that string theory predicts the 3 generations of particles in > the Standard Model, suggests that it's possible that monads come in 3 > varieties. But those varieties would have had to be available in the > primordial, uninflated set of 10 or more dimensions > Richard > > > Please read more detail on string theory, I hate to see you continue > in such a mistake. :_( String theory is materialist nonsense. > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Roger Clough <rclo...@verizon.net>wrote: > >> Hi Stephen P. King >> >> To Idealists, the "real" is the idea or concept of a thing, >> The thing as it it appears to us is a phenomenon. >> >> This inversion of common sense was made by Leibniz >> in order to get rid of the mind-body problem. There's >> no problem really if both are just concepts. They don't >> actually interact, but they can be conceived as interacting. >> >> There is a tricky point, and is I think a principal reason why L can >> be so confusing---- and critics have observed that even Leibniz can >> sometimes confuse the real with the phenomenal. >> >> 1) First of all, Idealists such as Leibniz. Berkeley and Kant consider >> IDEAS to be real, not the material or other phenomena they describe. >> For these guys, the descriptions are real, not the things or phenomena >> they describe, >> which admittedly are transitory. >> >> Which is NOT to say that to Leibniz, the world out there is a >> hallucination. >> No, it is just like it looks and he calls the world we see, >> although phenomenal, "well-founded phenomena". >> You can still stub your toe and feel pain, billiard balls will all >> collide as >> usual, etc. To all purposes, everything will seem normal. >> >> 2) The monads can only see the external world through the eyes of the >> supreme monad >> (or CPU). This is not direct sight, for one thing monads afre not spaced >> in space or time >> (perhaps heaven is like this ?). They don't really see the outside world, >> they only see an infinite number of of mirrors, those being reflections >> of the >> monad in question from the [points of view of the other monads. >> >> >> in the mirrors or "perceptions" of >> >> >> >> >> >> Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net >> 8/21/2012 >> Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so >> everything could function." >> > > snip >> > > > -- > Onward! > > Stephen > > "Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed." > ~ Francis Bacon > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
