On 8/24/2012 7:05 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
"...due to the law of conjugate bisimulation identity:
A ~ A = A ~ B ~ C ~ B ~ A = A ~ B ~ A
this is "retractable path independence": path independence only over retractable paths.
I don't understand this. You write A~(B~A) which implies that B~A is a "system" (in this
case one being simulated by A). But then you write
A~B~C~A =/= A~C~B~A =/= A~A
This seems inconsistent, since A~B~C~A = A~D~A where D=B~C, but then A~D~A=A~A. And
A~C~B~A = A~E~A where E=C~B, and then A~E~A=A~A. But then A~B~C~A = A~C~B~A.
You drop the parentheses, implying the relation is associative, but then you treat it as
though it isn't??
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at