Hi Richard,
OK! I'll read it.
On 8/23/2012 1:16 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
http://vixra.org/pdf/1101.0044v1.pdf
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Stephen P. King
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Richard,
I am not sure what you mean. Is there a paper or article that
gives an explanation of what you mean by "...method of Godel
sufficient to define a consciousness"? Are you considering how
meta-theory Y can prove statements in a theory X where X
/subtheory of Y?
On 8/23/2012 9:24 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Stephan,
Is not the method of Godel sufficient to define a consciousness
although the last step to consciousness is a leap of faith?
Richard
snip
--
Onward!
Stephen
"Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed."
~ Francis Bacon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
