Hi Richard,

    OK! I'll read it.

On 8/23/2012 1:16 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:

On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Stephen P. King <stephe...@charter.net <mailto:stephe...@charter.net>> wrote:

    Hi Richard,

        I am not sure what you mean. Is there a paper or article that
    gives an explanation of what you mean by "...method of Godel
    sufficient to define a consciousness"? Are you considering how
    meta-theory Y can prove statements in a theory X where X
    /subtheory of Y?

    On 8/23/2012 9:24 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:


        Is not the method of Godel sufficient to define a consciousness
        although the last step to consciousness is a leap of faith?




"Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed."
~ Francis Bacon

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to