OK! I'll read it.
On 8/23/2012 1:16 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Stephen P. King
<stephe...@charter.net <mailto:stephe...@charter.net>> wrote:
I am not sure what you mean. Is there a paper or article that
gives an explanation of what you mean by "...method of Godel
sufficient to define a consciousness"? Are you considering how
meta-theory Y can prove statements in a theory X where X
/subtheory of Y?
On 8/23/2012 9:24 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Is not the method of Godel sufficient to define a consciousness
although the last step to consciousness is a leap of faith?
"Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed."
~ Francis Bacon
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at