I am not sure what you mean. Is there a paper or article that gives
an explanation of what you mean by "...method of Godel sufficient to
define a consciousness"? Are you considering how meta-theory Y can prove
statements in a theory X where X /subtheory of Y?
On 8/23/2012 9:24 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Is not the method of Godel sufficient to define a consciousness
although the last step to consciousness is a leap of faith?
"Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed."
~ Francis Bacon
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at