http://vixra.org/pdf/1101.0044v1.pdf
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Stephen P. King <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Richard, > > I am not sure what you mean. Is there a paper or article that gives an > explanation of what you mean by "...method of Godel sufficient to define a > consciousness"? Are you considering how meta-theory Y can prove statements > in a theory X where X /subtheory of Y? > > > > On 8/23/2012 9:24 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote: > >> Stephan, >> >> Is not the method of Godel sufficient to define a consciousness >> although the last step to consciousness is a leap of faith? >> Richard >> >> >> snip > > > -- > Onward! > > Stephen > > "Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed." > ~ Francis Bacon > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To post to this group, send email to > everything-list@googlegroups.**com<[email protected]> > . > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe@ > **googlegroups.com <everything-list%[email protected]>. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** > group/everything-list?hl=en<http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en> > . > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
