On 10/17/2012 6:08 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, October 17, 2012 5:44:40 PM UTC-4, Stephen Paul King wrote:
On 10/17/2012 4:40 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
I meant that awareness is not emulable outside of awareness. You
can't make something which pretends to itself that it is
experiencing something. Once you have 1p awareness though, sure,
you can re-present and meta-represent all kinds of awareness
within itself.
Hi Craig,
But that is exactly the same thing that both I and Bruno agree
on. We call it 1p.
I am saying that it is 1p and 3p both though. Not ideal 3p, but actual
3p as it is a 1p experience which reflects other 1p experiences in a
qualitatively flattened way.
I'm OK with that.
The trick is to figure out how to chain together a sequence of
1p's to create a mathematical model of a "flow of conscious
awareness". ;-) I have an idea as to how to do this as Pratt
explains it.
Music is a pretty good model of that already.
Our hearing and understanding of music.. interesting! Like a model
of entrainment. I always notice a sense of anticipating the next note as
I listen to music...
Craig
--
Onward!
Stephen
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
