On Wednesday, October 17, 2012 5:44:40 PM UTC-4, Stephen Paul King wrote:
> On 10/17/2012 4:40 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
> I meant that awareness is not emulable outside of awareness. You can't
> make something which pretends to itself that it is experiencing something.
> Once you have 1p awareness though, sure, you can re-present and
> meta-represent all kinds of awareness within itself.
>> Hi Craig,
> But that is exactly the same thing that both I and Bruno agree on. We
> call it 1p.
I am saying that it is 1p and 3p both though. Not ideal 3p, but actual 3p
as it is a 1p experience which reflects other 1p experiences in a
qualitatively flattened way.
> The trick is to figure out how to chain together a sequence of 1p's to
> create a mathematical model of a "flow of conscious awareness". ;-) I have
> an idea as to how to do this as Pratt explains it.
Music is a pretty good model of that already.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at