On Wednesday, October 17, 2012 5:44:40 PM UTC-4, Stephen Paul King wrote: > > On 10/17/2012 4:40 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: > > I meant that awareness is not emulable outside of awareness. You can't > make something which pretends to itself that it is experiencing something. > Once you have 1p awareness though, sure, you can re-present and > meta-represent all kinds of awareness within itself. > >> Hi Craig, > > But that is exactly the same thing that both I and Bruno agree on. We > call it 1p. >
I am saying that it is 1p and 3p both though. Not ideal 3p, but actual 3p as it is a 1p experience which reflects other 1p experiences in a qualitatively flattened way. > The trick is to figure out how to chain together a sequence of 1p's to > create a mathematical model of a "flow of conscious awareness". ;-) I have > an idea as to how to do this as Pratt explains it. > Music is a pretty good model of that already. Craig > > -- > Onward! > > Stephen > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/everything-list/-/HfLU6DJ78zgJ. To post to this group, send email to email@example.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.