On 26 Dec 2012, at 22:41, meekerdb wrote:
On 12/26/2012 11:25 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
I don't think Tegmark takes the 1p indeterminacy into account,
except in the quantum wave, but not on math in general or in
arithmetic.
I thought his idea was that in the infinite universe there are
infinitely many Max Tegmarks for whom indeterminancy is realized by
different ones seeing different outcomes of quantum measurements -
just like your Moscow/Washington indeterminacy.
That seems to be what I said. Tegmark applies correctly the 1p-
indterminacy in the Quantum wave, but fails to appreciate it applies
already in elementary arithmetic, and that CTM forces us to derive the
wave from arithmetic, (and to not postulate it, nor anything (even
math) above arithmetic).
Bruno
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
