2013/2/6 Bruno Marchal <[email protected]>

>
> On 06 Feb 2013, at 10:22, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
>
>
>
>
> 2013/2/6 Stephen P. King <[email protected]>
>
>>  On 2/5/2013 3:27 PM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2013/2/5 Stephen P. King <[email protected]>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>     ISTM that purpose is a 1p, so to ask the question in a 3p sense is
>>> to make it meaningless.
>>>
>>>
>>>  That´s it.
>>
>>
>>  But to insist into make the question in 3p may  force the introduction
>> of an implicit  1p that contemplate the 3p, that is,  a metamind , with a
>> metatime etc. (To avoid pavlovian responses, i don´t mention the G. world).
>> That is the meaning of my previous response.
>>
>>
>> Hi Alberto,
>>
>>     But the meta versions would be 1p's in their own right, no?
>>
>>
>> Absolutely.  Not only when talking about purpose. Most of the concepts we
> use are 1p,  so it is supposed that they are meaningless when used in the
> description of a multiverse . Precisely because the multiverse is a design
> with the explicit goal of eliminate purpose as an axiom.
>
> But at the end, as I mentioned, this goal is not possible, because we can
> not avoid the infinite regression in the search for causes, and causality
> is 1p indeed.
>
>
> I agree that causality is 1p, but that makes causality emergent, and
> secondary, not fundamental.
> We can stop the regression at the place we postulate the theory. I have
> explained why arithmetic is a good starting places. It explains the
> physical and non physical 1p and 3p, and it explains why we cannot take
> less than arithmetic (or Turing equivalent).
>
>
>
> Se inadvertently, when we talk about what exist and what do not exist in a
> multiverse, we turn into looking at an implicit 1p designer of the
> multiverse
>
>
> Arithmetic is enough. It is 3p.
>
>
>
>
> At the end we can not think outside 1p. Scientific inquiry is  comunicable
> 1p.
>
>
> If it is communicable, it can be 1p, but it is genuinely 3p too. The 1p
> part is not relevant, I think. Unless you assume that the whole arithmetic
> truth is conscious. That's an open problem, but we don't need to solve it
> to extract physics from the "number's dreams".
>
>
> Math is ambiguous on that.  We can postulate a 3p mathematical existence
apart from any mind and  any reality.
We can imagine that, but this is probably because we assume an implicit 1p
mind or meta-mind that is contemplating the mathematical thing. That is my
guess and this is the most coherent notion of existence, related to a
mind,, even for mathematical existence  (apart form a null hypothesis in
which everything exist). That is indeed the  neoplatonic view. Its´nt it?

>
>
> Because the world of the mind -where we live- is and ever will be
> teleological.
>
>
> OK with this. In a sense, matter is teleological with comp.
>
> Bruno
>
>
>
>
>
>>>
>>> On 2/5/2013 6:23 AM, Russell Standish wrote:
>>>
>>>> Only in the same sense that evolution is teleological, ie not really.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 06:59:01PM +1100, Kim Jones wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> So does this explain the PURPOSE of the universe or merely a dominant
>>>>> FUNCTION? The blind exercise of function doesn't seem to me to include the
>>>>> global concept of purpose. The use of this word is about my only gripe 
>>>>> with
>>>>> it. I could be wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> K
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Onward!
>>
>> Stephen
>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Alberto.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>
>
>  http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
>
>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>



-- 
Alberto.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to