On 2/5/2013 3:27 PM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
2013/2/5 Stephen P. King <stephe...@charter.net
ISTM that purpose is a 1p, so to ask the question in a 3p
sense is to make it meaningless.
But to insist into make the question in 3p may force the introduction
of an implicit 1p that contemplate the 3p, that is, a metamind ,
with a metatime etc. (To avoid pavlovian responses, i don´t mention
the G. world). That is the meaning of my previous response.
But the meta versions would be 1p's in their own right, no?
On 2/5/2013 6:23 AM, Russell Standish wrote:
Only in the same sense that evolution is teleological, ie not
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 06:59:01PM +1100, Kim Jones wrote:
So does this explain the PURPOSE of the universe or merely
a dominant FUNCTION? The blind exercise of function
doesn't seem to me to include the global concept of
purpose. The use of this word is about my only gripe with
it. I could be wrong.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.