On 2/5/2013 3:27 PM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
2013/2/5 Stephen P. King <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
Hi,
ISTM that purpose is a 1p, so to ask the question in a 3p
sense is to make it meaningless.
That´s it.
But to insist into make the question in 3p may force the introduction
of an implicit 1p that contemplate the 3p, that is, a metamind ,
with a metatime etc. (To avoid pavlovian responses, i don´t mention
the G. world). That is the meaning of my previous response.
Hi Alberto,
But the meta versions would be 1p's in their own right, no?
On 2/5/2013 6:23 AM, Russell Standish wrote:
Only in the same sense that evolution is teleological, ie not
really.
Cheers
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 06:59:01PM +1100, Kim Jones wrote:
So does this explain the PURPOSE of the universe or merely
a dominant FUNCTION? The blind exercise of function
doesn't seem to me to include the global concept of
purpose. The use of this word is about my only gripe with
it. I could be wrong.
Cheers,
K
--
Onward!
Stephen
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
