On Saturday, April 6, 2013 12:38:16 AM UTC-4, yanniru wrote:
>
> There is no hell
>

I wouldn't know, but there are stories out there of hellish NDEs.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/02/08/is-hell-real-people-who-went-there-say-yes.html

"Working with Greyson, Bush identified several types of what she 
calls “distressing” near-death experiences. Some have the same features as 
heavenly experiences—bright lights, life flashing before your eyes, 
etc.—but the person simply interprets them negatively. Another type 
featured a “void” like Matthew Botsford’s overwhelming blackness or some 
other type of absolute sensory deprivation. And yet another class, by far 
the most varied, involved visions of actual hell.

[..]

"Hell experiences further complicate matters for religious believers, 
because they have no discernable relation to what kind of life a person has 
lived. In other words, being a good person who goes to church is no 
guarantee that you won’t get into a terrible car accident and suddenly find 
yourself experiencing what feels, in a very real sense, like hell. As Bush 
has seen, “What we think people deserve has nothing to do with whether they 
have a glorious experience or a terrible one.”"

Craig

>
>
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Craig Weinberg 
> <[email protected]<javascript:>
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Friday, April 5, 2013 3:39:52 PM UTC-4, JohnM wrote:
>>>
>>> I think I side with Craig: NDE is not "N" enough, is not "D" because the 
>>> 'observer' (gossiper?) came "back" and not "E" - rather a compendium 
>>> of hearsay (s)he stored previously about "D"-like phenomena. 
>>> When a (human or other) complexity dissolves (= death) nobody comes back 
>>> to tell the stories. This comes from a 'participant' and long time partner 
>>> in OUIJA-board sessions of honest friends. I still cannot explain those 
>>> miraculous experiences (saved my life once) coming allegedly from 'dead' 
>>> benefactors I knew before they died. 
>>>
>>
>> Someone brought a OUIJA board to school in fourth grade and I was using 
>> it with a friend. Unimpressed, another fourth girl that neither of us knew 
>> very well said we should ask a question that nobody would know. She asked 
>> what the name of her bird was. As the word LANCELOT was spelled out, she 
>> was dumbstruck. This was a very studious 10 year old Asian girl in a highly 
>> gifted program - we covered a lot of science in class and I think it is 
>> safe to say that she was scientifically oriented. If she had some secret 
>> pact with the girl I was doing the board with, she certainly didn't seem 
>> very happy about it and she didn't seem like a very good actress. She 
>> seemed confused and worried and did not want any more to do with the board.
>>
>> Craig
>>
>>
>>> I do not support the reference to the BIG journals (had ~100 
>>> publications, some in such, then was editor of a 'smaller' one) - it is 
>>> 'click-stuff' and refereed by well selected (opinionated) scientists 
>>> mostly. However the reference to the Nobel prize lost its credibility e.g. 
>>> with certain (peace)Prize assignment going to a war-monger politician. Even 
>>> in sciences it occurred that hypothetical and fantasy-based ideas were 
>>> awarded the Prize (e.g. circumstances of the Big Bang etc.). Not to mention 
>>> the questionable lit.
>>>
>>> What does an agnostic like myself believe? that we don't know 'it'. 
>>>
>>> John M
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:56 PM, John Clark <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013  Craig Weinberg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Dull in what way?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dull in the way that reading what some Bozo I've never heard of typed 
>>>> onto a obscure website about experimental results that would revolutionize 
>>>> not just science but the entire world if true are dull. 
>>>>
>>>> > You didn't read the article I guess 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have not read it nor do I intend to; let me know when something like 
>>>> that shows up in Science or Nature or Physical Review letters. 
>>>>
>>>>   John K Clark 
>>>>
>>>>  -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to everything-li...@**googlegroups.com.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to everyth...@googlegroups.**com.
>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**
>>>> group/everything-list?hl=en<http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en>
>>>> .
>>>> For more options, visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out<https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>
>>>> .
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>
>>>  -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<javascript:>
>> .
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>  
>>  
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to