On 14 May 2013, at 00:24, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/13/2013 2:49 PM, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Does the UD compute *all* functions or only those that are
recursively enumerable?
It computes all of them.
It computes only the computable one. But it generates all inputs and
streams, like in the WM duplication, it generates all sequences of W
and M, so the UD computes all computable functions, on all inputs/
oracles.
By comp our mind states are UD accessible, as they are brought by some
computations.
Bruno
Brent
AFAIK, the latter, as a set, has a measure zero as a subset of the
former. This is one reason why I worry about the viability of UDA
(and AUDA), it postulates a severely restricted subset of the
possible functions as ontologically primitive without a good
argument as to why.
Just because we finite mortals can only counts in terms of natural
numbers is not an argument that All-that-Exists is limited to that
standard. Man is NOT the measure of all things!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.