On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 01 Oct 2013, at 17:09, Telmo Menezes wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 30 Sep 2013, at 14:05, Telmo Menezes wrote <to Craig>:
>>>
>>>
>>> The comp assumption that computations have
>>>
>>> qualia hidden inside them is not much of an answer either in my view.
>>>
>>>
>>> I have the same problem.
>>>
>>>
>>> The solution is in the fact that all machines have that problem. More
>>> exactly: all persons capable of surviving a digital substitution must
>>> have
>>> that and similar problems. It is a sort of meta-solution explaining that
>>> we
>>> are indeed confronted to something which is simply totally unexplainable.
>>>
>>> Note also that the expression "computation have qualia" can be
>>> misleading. A
>>> computation has no qualia, strictly speaking. Only a person supported by
>>> an
>>> infinity of computation can be said to have qualia, or to live qualia.
>>> Then
>>> the math of self-reference can be used to explain why the qualia have to
>>> escape the pure third person type of explanations.
>>
>>
>> Thanks Bruno. Is there some formal proof of this? Can it be followed
>> by a mere mortal?
>
>
> It follows from comp, the classical definition of knowledge (the agreement
> that the modal logic S4 defines an axiomatic of knowledge) and then from
> Solovay theorem, and the fact that
>
> (Bp <-> Bp & p) belongs to G* minus G.
>
>  It is explained in details in the long version "conscience et mécanisme",
> and with less detail in the short Lille thesis (that you have).

Ok, I'm preparing to start chapter 4, the movie graph argument.

> It is also
> explained in the second part of sane04.
>
> Formally a key text is the S4 provability chapter in Boolos 79 and 93, and
> the articles referred too.
>
> We can come back on this. It is the heart of the Arithmeticalization of the
> UDA. It *is¨probably very naive, and I was sure this would be refuted, but
> it is not, yet.
>
> I think it can be understood by mere mortals, having enough times and
> motivation.
>
> For the sigma_1 restriction, you need also a good understanding around Gödel
> and Mechanism. One of the best good is the book by Judson Webb. Torkel
> Franzen's two books are quite good also. If you read the french I summarize
> a big part of the literature on that in "conscience & mécanisme".
>
> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/bxlthesis/consciencemecanisme.html

Thanks!

>
> Bruno
>
>
>
>>
>>> A good exercise consists in trying to think about what could like an
>>> explanation of what a qualia is. Even without comp, that will seem
>>> impossible, and that explains why some people, like Craig, estimate that
>>> we
>>> have to take them as primitive. here comp explains, why there are things
>>> like qualia, which can emerge only in the frist person points of view,
>>> and
>>> admit irreductible components.
>>>
>>> Bruno
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Everything List" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>>> email to [email protected].
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to