On 10/2/2013 2:04 AM, Russell Standish wrote:
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 10:09:03AM -0700, meekerdb wrote:
On 10/1/2013 4:13 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Note also that the expression "computation have qualia" can be
misleading. A computation has no qualia, strictly speaking. Only a
person supported by an infinity of computation can be said to have
qualia, or to live qualia.
Why an infinity of computation?? That would preclude my building an
intelligent robot having qualia, since it's computations would
always be finite. And I doubt there is room in my head for infinite
computations - certainly not digital ones.
He is alluding to the universal dovetailer here, which contains an
infinite number of distinct computations that implement any given
However, it is not clear that it is necessary for it to be infinite -
in a nonrebust world that doesn't contain a UD, we still consider the
possbility of conscious computations in the MGA.
Yes, I know what he is alluding to. But if it really does take all those infinite threads
of computation to realize conscious states, then I think that is the same as saying it
takes the underlying physics of a brain (or computer) to realize consciousness. But then
Bruno's program of explaining things from computation hasn't avoided relying on the
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.