Stephen,

Your error here is assuming the computations take place in a single "wide" 
physical dimensional space. They don't. They take place in a purely 
computational space prior to the existence of physical dimensional 
spacetime. Physical dimensional spacetime is a product of the computations. 
They don't exist within it. Therefore there is no spacetime separation 
between computations. They exist in a purely logical space prior to 
dimensionalization which they compute.

Edgar



On Thursday, January 9, 2014 10:06:33 PM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
>
> Dear Edgar,
>
>   You wrote: "there is not a single universal processor, there is a 
> single processor CYCLE. All information states are effectively their own 
> processors, so the computational universe consists of myriads of 
> processors, as many as there are information states (more or less). But all 
> these myriads of processors all cycle their computations together in the 
> same present moment, i.e. in the SAME computational space."
>
>   As someone deeply involved in studying distributed computation from the 
> inside and the outside, I have to tell you, there is no difference between 
> "a single computer" and "a myriad of processors that all cycle their 
> computations together". That is a difference that does *not* make a 
> difference. Unless you take concurrency into account (and it does not seem 
> that you do) there is no distiction between a single processor running "the 
> universe as a computation" or a huge number of processors running 
> in parallel as you describe.
>
>   The problem is that if the distribution of physical processors is wide 
> enough in space and the processors have different associated velocities in 
> their motions, there is no such a thing as a single frame 
> of simultaneity for them all to be said to be "cycling together in the same 
> present moment". Nope.
>
>    Add to that simultaneity problem the problem of resource allocation and 
> one has a real mess! (Forget about the intractability issues...) There 
> seems to be a lot of bad thinking when it comes to what exactly is a 
> computation. Let me try a definition of "computation":
>
> Any transformation of information.
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Edgar L. Owen <[email protected]<javascript:>
> > wrote:
>
>> Stephen,
>>
>> There is NO such requirement. See my response to Liz..
>>
>> Edgar
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, January 9, 2014 8:45:40 PM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear LizR,
>>>
>>>   Exactly. That requirement of a single computer is deeply troublesome 
>>> for me.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:16 PM, LizR <[email protected] <javascript:>>wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 10 January 2014 14:01, Edgar L. Owen <[email protected] 
>>>> <javascript:>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Stephen,
>>>>>
>>>>> There is no "single observer that can take in all events...". I never 
>>>>> said that and don't believe it.
>>>>>
>>>>> However there has to be a single universal processor cycling for a 
>>>>> computational universe to work. That single universal processor cycle is 
>>>>> the present moment P-time. All computations occur simultaneously as these 
>>>>> cycles occur. All individual observers, clock times etc. occur and are 
>>>>> computed within this actual extant presence of the computational space of 
>>>>> reality.
>>>>>
>>>>> There has to be a *single processor* computing *the state of the 
>>>> universe*?!
>>>>
>>>> I know that's possible in principle, what with the C-T thesis and all 
>>>> that, but it's a bit of a limitation to put on your ideas. (Or maybe it 
>>>> has 
>>>> 10^80 cores? :-) 
>>>>
>>>>  -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
>>>> Google Groups "Everything List" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/
>>>> topic/everything-list/TBc_y2MZV5c/unsubscribe.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
>>>> [email protected] <javascript:>.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to 
>>>> [email protected]<javascript:>
>>>> .
>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>>
>>> Kindest Regards,
>>>
>>> Stephen Paul King
>>>
>>> Senior Researcher
>>>
>>> Mobile: (864) 567-3099
>>>
>>> [email protected] <javascript:>
>>>
>>>  http://www.provensecure.us/
>>>
>>>  
>>> “This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use 
>>> of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain 
>>> information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential and 
>>> exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may be constituted as 
>>> attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
>>> hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of 
>>> this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
>>> message in error, notify sender immediately and delete this message 
>>> immediately.” 
>>>  
>>  -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
>> Google Groups "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/everything-list/TBc_y2MZV5c/unsubscribe
>> .
>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
>> [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<javascript:>
>> .
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
>
> Kindest Regards,
>
> Stephen Paul King
>
> Senior Researcher
>
> Mobile: (864) 567-3099
>
> [email protected] <javascript:>
>
>  http://www.provensecure.us/
>
>  
> “This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of 
> the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain 
> information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential and 
> exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may be constituted as 
> attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
> hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of 
> this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
> message in error, notify sender immediately and delete this message 
> immediately.” 
>  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to