On 14 January 2014 14:55, Edgar L. Owen <[email protected]> wrote:

> Liz,
>
> There is no FTL because this is not a physical dimensional space, it's a
> computational space. The notion of 'together' is computational interaction
> rather than dimensional co-location.
>

How is a computational space defined?

>
> Clock time doesn't produce the processor cycles because clock times are
> computed by those cycles. Only a separate Present moment P-time can provide
> processor cycles that clock time can be computed within.
>
> Sorry I was using "clock time" in the sense of a computer's clock, i.e. to
mean processor time.

What is an elemental computation?

Presmably all the information involved can be represented digitally? If so,
then it can only take on certain values - a single processor would perhaps
be storing a particular number on a given clock cycle. The limiting case
would be a single bit - which is what happens in the Game of Life. More
likely, if the processors are going to output the universe, they would have
to store larger value, but one of a finite range of values.

I'm not sure I see how the "active evolution" differs from "sequential data
states", given that the computations are synchronised by a universal
processing cycle.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to