On 14 January 2014 20:24, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:
> On 1/13/2014 11:16 PM, LizR wrote:
> On 14 January 2014 19:42, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:
>> On 1/13/2014 10:18 PM, LizR wrote:
> So you don't think a discussion of what counts as an AI is a good idea?
> OK, that's fine by me (you're the one who wants to discuss it, after all!)
> No, I meant I don't think it's a good idea to try to restrict AI to mean a
> *conscious* computer. I'm certainly willing to assume it's possible. I
> don't think a philosophers zombie is possible.
I just want to use the possibility of a conscious computer programme while
disussing this idea Edgar has that it would always be possible to know if
one is in a virtual reality.
> So let's just assume it's possible, since it's presumably a consequence of
> Edgar's theory, that a computer could be conscious,
> I don't know that Edgar agrees to that, although it would seem to be a
> consequence of his theory. He hasn't said what it would take for a robot
> to be conscious. Would intelligent behavior be enough?
I'm not sure Deep Blue is conscious, but it certainly appeared to be
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.