Liz, Correct. Most reality math is likely fairly simple and fairly limited. That's why Bruno's 'comp' that assumes all math exists out there somewhere is so extraordinarily wrong and excessive and non-parsimonious.
As for the grid cells on the GR rubber sheet model just imagine a mass-energy content in one cell dilating it. That automatically produces a curvature in the rubber sheet around that mass-energy consistent with the effects of space curvature in GR. Edgar On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 12:52:24 AM UTC-5, Liz R wrote: > > On 14 January 2014 16:49, Edgar L. Owen <[email protected] <javascript:>>wrote: > >> Liz, >> >> Sure, the particle property conservation laws that conserve the amounts >> of particle properties in elementary particle interactions, and the laws >> that govern the binding of elementary particles in matter. These are the >> fundamental computations that determine most of the structure of the >> universe.... >> > > OK, but I would imagine most conservations laws don't require much > computation - aren't they more akin to storing (i.e. conserving) data? > >> >> How and where is the code stored? There is no 'where' in a >> non-dimensional computational space. How it is stored I intimated in an >> earlier response of an hour or so ago. It's stored as combinations of code >> and data in the actual process of evolving computationally. >> > > I don't understand what you mean by the code and data are stored "in the > process of evolving computationally" > >> >> How do the computations decide what data they will interact with? The >> computations include the data they compute in one information structure as >> explained above. >> > > Where does that data come from? Is there any interaction between adjacent > computations? (Are there such things as adjacent computations? If there > isn't, how does locality emerge?) > >> >> What grid cells? Aren't you familiar with the standard rubber sheet model >> of GR? The rubber sheet has grid cells drawn on it. >> >> The grid cells drawn in embedding diagrams are there to show the metrical > properties of space-time, while the computations you're talking about are, > I believe, what *generates* space-time. I don't (as yet) see an obvious > connection between the two. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
