Brent, Aren't you familiar with the concept of a logical or mathematical or computational space that is non-dimensional? Simply stated it's just the locus or association of some set of elements. There is no necessary physical dimensionality associated with the concept.
Edgar On Monday, January 13, 2014 9:09:33 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote: > > On 1/13/2014 5:55 PM, Edgar L. Owen wrote: > > Liz, > > > > There is no FTL because this is not a physical dimensional space, it's a > computational > > space. The notion of 'together' is computational interaction rather than > dimensional > > co-location. > > OK, it's not dimensional, which I take to mean it's not a Riemannian > manifold. So what is > it, and what makes it "a space". Does it have a topology, a definition of > "next to"? Is > it Hausdorf? "Space" is very general, but it must have some structure, > beyond just being > a set of computations, to count as being a space. > > Brent > > > > > Clock time doesn't produce the processor cycles because clock times are > computed by > > those cycles. Only a separate Present moment P-time can provide > processor cycles that > > clock time can be computed within. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
