Aren't you familiar with the concept of a logical or mathematical or
computational space that is non-dimensional? Simply stated it's just the
locus or association of some set of elements. There is no necessary
physical dimensionality associated with the concept.
On Monday, January 13, 2014 9:09:33 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
> On 1/13/2014 5:55 PM, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
> > Liz,
> > There is no FTL because this is not a physical dimensional space, it's a
> > space. The notion of 'together' is computational interaction rather than
> > co-location.
> OK, it's not dimensional, which I take to mean it's not a Riemannian
> manifold. So what is
> it, and what makes it "a space". Does it have a topology, a definition of
> "next to"? Is
> it Hausdorf? "Space" is very general, but it must have some structure,
> beyond just being
> a set of computations, to count as being a space.
> > Clock time doesn't produce the processor cycles because clock times are
> computed by
> > those cycles. Only a separate Present moment P-time can provide
> processor cycles that
> > clock time can be computed within.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.