I am dyslexic... Do you know what a Fiber Bundle is? I ask this because
the explanation does not transfer very well into English. I have tried to
summerize the theory previously and didn't get very favorable results. I
didn't discover it... It is the work of a Japanese Prof. Hitoshi Kitada:
This paper might be the best conversational presentation:
Comments on the Problem of Time
Hitoshi Kitada <http://arxiv.org/find/gr-qc/1/au:+Kitada_H/0/1/0/all/0/1>
of Tokyo & Univ. of Virginia), Lancelot R.
Free Lance Academy)
(Submitted on 22 Aug 1997 (v1 <http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9708055v1>), last
revised 1 Nov 1997 (this version, v4))
The problem of time, considered as a problem in the usual physical context,
is reflected in relation with the paper by Kauffman and Smolin (
gr-qc/9703026 <http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9703026>). It is shown that the
problem is a misposed problem in the sense that it was raised with a lack
of the recognition of mathematically known facts.
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Edgar L. Owen <edgaro...@att.net> wrote:
> Speaking of parsing correctly, I presume you meant WRITE rather than read?
> Anyway glad we agree block time is nonsense. So what's your idea of time
> that is not "BS", and that is not a "cartoon with many lacuna"?
> A quick summary please?
> On Saturday, January 18, 2014 2:06:04 PM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
>> Dear Edgar,
>> LOL! You don't parse what I read very well... I have been saying that
>> block time is a BS idea. Time is not like that at all. I have a model of
>> time that works great in physics, but not many know of it. BTW, I do
>> appreciate your concept, but it is a cartoon with many lacuna. It needs a
>> lot of formalism and polish to even be said to work.
>> For one thing, your notion of a computational space makes no sense at
>> all. Sorry.
>> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Edgar L. Owen <edga...@att.net> wrote:
>> I agree with your criticism of Bruno's UDA. It has no explanation for
>> becoming, for anything ever happening. I've also pointed this out.
>> However, this is equally true of block time, which you seem to believe
>> in. In block time there is no convincing way anything can ever actually
>> On the other hand my model solves this fundamental problem by positing an
>> actively computing reality in a present moment of p-time as the fundamental
>> level of reality.
>> On Saturday, January 18, 2014 11:54:15 AM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
>> Dear Bruno,
>> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 5:54 AM, Bruno Marchal <mar...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:
>> On 17 Jan 2014, at 20:38, Stephen Paul King wrote:
>> Dear Bruno,
>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Bruno Marchal <mar...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:
>> On 16 Jan 2014, at 04:44, Stephen Paul King wrote:
>> Dear LizR,
>> But stop and think of the implications of what even Bruno is saying.
>> is completely a construction of our minds.* *There is no 3,1 dimensional
>> Riemannian manifold out there*. We measure events and our minds put
>> those together into tableaux that we communicate about and agree on,
>> because our languages, like formal logical system, force the results to
>> obey a set of implied rules. We formulate explanations, formulate models
>> and look for rules that the models might obey. Hopefully we can make
>> predictions and measure something...
>> <div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,s
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Stephen Paul King
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
“This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of
the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain
information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential and
exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may be constituted as
attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of
this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
message in error, notify sender immediately and delete this message
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.