Quentin,

Please refer to my extensive posts to Jesse for that...

Edgar

On Thursday, February 6, 2014 1:21:13 PM UTC-5, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
>
> So, what is it ? What is it supposed to solve in the first place ?
>
>
> 2014-02-06 Edgar L. Owen <[email protected] <javascript:>>:
>
>> Quentin,
>>
>> But it's NOT the case...
>>
>> Edgar
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, February 6, 2014 10:52:58 AM UTC-5, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2014-02-06 Jesse Mazer <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Edgar L. Owen <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> But recall that p-time is not a directly measurable quantity so 
>>>>> "arbitrary precision" does not apply. You still haven't grasped the 
>>>>> concept 
>>>>> correctly. P-time has no direct measure, because the present moment is 
>>>>> that 
>>>>> in which all measures, including those of clock time, are computed. 
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't recall you ever spelling that out in conversation with me, 
>>>> thanks for clarifying. In the past people had asked you about how to 
>>>> determine p-time and you had said things like "we should be able to 
>>>> compute 
>>>> p-time from Omega, the curvature of the universe" (in the post at 
>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/everything-list@
>>>> googlegroups.com/msg47450.html ). So if you now say that determining 
>>>> which events are simultaneous in p-time is fundamentally impossible for 
>>>> any 
>>>> being within the universe, that answers what I was wondering about in 
>>>> question #1.
>>>>
>>>
>>> If that's the case... what good is it to entertain such "p-time"... it's 
>>> useless. Predict nothing, cannot be measured. What is p-time supposed to 
>>> solve ?
>>>  
>>>
>>>>  
>>>> Jesse
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Nevertheless the fact of existence of all observers and thus of 
>>>>> everything in the present moment is a direct empirical observation. Just 
>>>>> like consciousness it is not subject to measure, but that doesn't mean it 
>>>>> doesn't exist.
>>>>>
>>>>> Edgar
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thursday, February 6, 2014 12:47:05 AM UTC-5, jessem wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 7:38 PM, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  On 2/5/2014 9:31 AM, Jesse Mazer wrote:
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> --question 1 dealt with the question of how YOU would define p-time 
>>>>>>> simultaneity in a cosmological model where there's no way to slice the 
>>>>>>> 4D 
>>>>>>> spacetime into a series of 3D surfaces such that the density of matter 
>>>>>>> is 
>>>>>>> perfectly uniform on each slice (and that uniform can be characterized 
>>>>>>> by 
>>>>>>> the parameter Omega), unlike in the simple FLRW model where matter is 
>>>>>>> assumed to be distributed in this perfectly uniform way.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't see that perfect uniformity is necessary.  We have 
>>>>>>> calculated our epoch relative to the CMB as 13.8By.  I assume any other 
>>>>>>> scientific species in the universe could do the same and so say whether 
>>>>>>> they were 'at the same time' as measured by expansion of the cosmos.  I 
>>>>>>> don't see how the existence of galaxies and galaxy clusters precludes 
>>>>>>> this 
>>>>>>> kind of measurement.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Using the CMB may give an approximate answer, but would you argue it 
>>>>>> could distinguish between different simultaneity definitions that agree 
>>>>>> approximately when averaged over large scales, but disagree somewhat 
>>>>>> about 
>>>>>> the details of simultaneity in highly curved regions? For example, could 
>>>>>> the CMB be used to define a unique definition of simultaneity in the 
>>>>>> neighborhood of a black hole (where coordinate systems like 
>>>>>> Schwarzschild 
>>>>>> coordinates and Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates and Kruskal-Szekeres 
>>>>>> coordinates give very different definitions of simultaneity)? Edgar 
>>>>>> isn't 
>>>>>> just claiming some approximate pragmatic truth about simultaneity, he's 
>>>>>> claiming an absolute and exact truth about simultaneity in all 
>>>>>> circumstances, I was asking if he thinks this truth can be empirically 
>>>>>> determined to arbitrary precision even in principle, and if so what 
>>>>>> empirical observations would be used. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jesse
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> Brent
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. (Roy 
>>> Batty/Rutger Hauer)
>>>  
>>  -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<javascript:>
>> .
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. (Roy 
> Batty/Rutger Hauer)
>  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to