On Saturday, May 10, 2014, Telmo Menezes <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
>
> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Stathis Papaioannou 
> <[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10 May 2014 20:12, Telmo Menezes 
>> <[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 8:30 AM, LizR 
>>> <[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 10 May 2014 17:30, Stathis Papaioannou 
>>>> <[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Saturday, May 10, 2014, LizR 
>>>>> <[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I guess one could start from "is physics computable?" (As Max Tegmark
>>>>>> discusses in his book, but I haven't yet read what his conclusions are, 
>>>>>> if
>>>>>> any). If physics is computable and consciousness arises somehow in a
>>>>>> "materialist-type way" from the operation of the brain, then 
>>>>>> consciousness
>>>>>> will be computable by definition.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Is that trivially obvious to you? The anti-comp crowd claim that even
>>>>> if brain behaviour is computable that does not mean that a computer
>>>>> could be conscious, since it may require the actual brain matter, and not
>>>>> just a simulation, to generate the consciousness.
>>>>>
>>>>> If physics is computable, and consciousness arises from physics with
>>>> nothing extra (supernatural or whatever) then yes. Am I missing something
>>>> obvious?
>>>>
>>>
>> You're missing the step where you explain how doing the computations
>> generates consciousness.
>>
>
> No, that was the initial assumption.
>
> You said: "The anti-comp crowd claim that even if brain behaviour is
> computable that does not mean that a computer could be conscious, since it
> may require the actual brain matter"
>
> So it is implied that some none-computable part of the brain generates
> consciousness, which immediately contradicts the assumption that brain
> behaviour is computable.
>

It could be that some system the behaviour of which is entirely
computable gives rise to consciousness. But consciousness is not a
behaviour.


>  That is what I understand "consciousness is computable" to mean.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Yeah, I always feel the same about this sort of argument. It seems so
>>> trivial to disprove:
>>>
>>> "even if brain behaviour is computable that does not mean that a
>>> computer could be conscious, since it may require the actual brain matter,
>>> and not just a simulation, to generate the consciousness."
>>>
>>> 1. If brain behaviour is computable and (let's say comp)
>>>
>>
>> Not "and let's say comp", since that is what you are setting out to prove
>>
>>
>>> 2. brain generates consciousness but
>>> 3. it requires actual brain matter to do so then
>>> 4. brain behaviour is not computable (~comp)
>>>
>>
>> No, that doesn't follow. That brain behaviour is computable means that we
>> are able to compute such things as the sequence in which neurons will fire
>> and the effect neuronal activity will have on muscle.
>>
>>
>>>  so comp = ~comp
>>>
>>> I also wonder if I'm missing something, since I hear this one a lot.
>>>
>>
>> A computer model of a thunderstorm will predict the behaviour of a real
>> thunderstorm but it won't be wet. In contrast, I believe that a computer
>> model of a brain will not only predict the behaviour of a real brain but
>> will also be conscious. However, I don't think this is trivially obvious.
>>
>
> A computer model and computability are different things. We have to be
> precise about what the initial assumptions mean.
>

Computability is an abstract concept. I understand the idea that a physical
system is "computable" as meaning that there is an algorithm that allows us
to predict its behaviour. I don't see how this could be applied to
consciousness being computable in the same way, since consciousness is not
a behaviour. The only sense I can make of consciousness being computable is
that by doing the computations, consciousness is generated.


-- 
Stathis Papaioannou

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to