On 8/5/2014 4:23 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On the other hand, you talk about "usefulness" in a very narrow sense. What makes life bearable in this weird reality we find ourselves in is very personal. We all have our different ways and different questions that we would like to answer, maybe.

      It essentially cuts off any avenue of help.


No it doesn't! It doesn't follow from "a certain theory of consciousness provides no help for Alzheimer" that "there is no possibility of help for Alzheimer".


When you refer to what makes life bearable is very personal seems to identify "life" with "consciousness", since that is what is very personal. When I said a theory of consciousness that makes it independent of all external interactions cuts off all avenues of help, I meant help for those personal experiences. Kim even went so far as to suggest that, in spite of external appearances, those with Alzheimers might be perfectly happy and content and there is no need to try to help. The trouble with such a theory is that it applies as well to those apoplectic with rage or sobbing in sorrow - maybe they're really happy, we just can't know.

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to