On 15 March 2015 at 08:59, John Mikes <[email protected]> wrote: > LizR: > Consciousness, in my vocabulary sounds like: Response to Relations, not a > mental awarness in thinking/living creatures. Your views may be correct, if > you accept conclusions drawn in the name of the present science upon the > incomplete circumstances we already know of. Including Ccness as some > mental awareness in living minds. Your 'evolutionary advantages' are > triggered - maybe including - effects from so far even unreceived domains. > Similarly I would think twice to call an extinction 'devolutionary'. > My statement stays: I don't know. > A tyranosaure - even with terrific 'enthusiasm' - could not resist to > starving. > > I accept your denigratory opinion rather than being part of a contemporary > science - cheating/lying (theorizing?) based upon denied ignorance. > Your humble agnostix >
I still don't understand what you're saying. Sorry. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
