In addition to that: I doubt whether Bruno would deny life from an infertile person (animal - plant) althouth there is NO reproduction there. I am not sure about the role of 'universal numbers' in that. Pack of cigarettes as epitome of *life*? I am a non-smoker, but alive (I think).
Now comes the first person view that does not require faith? I think it does. Whatever we 'think' 'conclude' 'decide' is based on our faith in ourselves. If we do not BELIEVE that we ARE, all these thinks disappear. That is FAITH. JM On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Samiya Illias <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 08-Apr-2016, at 4:34 am, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > >> Do you have a definition for life? > > > > Whatever can reproduce itself relatively to some universal numbers. > > Reproduction is a need of mortals to perpetuate/live through their > progeny; life can be both mortal and immortal. Immortal Life need not > reproduce. Yet, it would still be alive, rather more so than us mortals. > Wouldn't it? > > Samiya > > > > example: pack of cigarettes, which have a complex reproduction system, > involving human brains, ... > > > > Bruno > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
