On Monday, December 18, 2017 at 6:37:39 PM UTC, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 16 Dec 2017, at 19:00, John Clark wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 9:20 PM, <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
> wrote:
>
> ​> ​
>> I don't see how Wigner's friend presents a problem for Copenhagen. 
>> According to the CI, the wf collapses when the system measured, which is 
>> when the box is opened. What am I missing?
>>
>
> ​
> According to
> ​ ​
> Copenhagen
> ​ ​
> Wigner's friend
> ​ ​
> opens the cat box and that 
> ​​
> collapses
> ​ ​
> the cat's wave function, and so Wigner's friend
> ​ ​
> now knows the cat's fate, but Wigner's friend
> ​ ​
> is also in a box and Wigner
> ​ ​
> himself is outside that box, so until Wigner opens his friend's box his 
> friend is in a "I see a dead cat" state AND a "I see a live cat state".  
> And of course you could put Wigner himself in a box with somebody outside 
> it and you could keep increasing the number of nested boxes until the 
> entire universe is included, and that is why the Copenhagen
> ​ ​
> interpretation is useless if you're 
> ​interest is in ​
> dealing in cosmology because there is nobody outside 
> ​to​
>  universe observe it.
>
>  And God 
> ​is of no help unless somebody knows who collapses God's wave function, 
> ​and even then there would be another unanswered question too obvious to 
> mention.
>
>
> And with Digital Mechanism, even a Universe cannot help. How could 
> *anything* select a computation, or a class of computations, among all 
> computations?
> But the first person associated to the universal numbers, involved in the 
> semi-computable relations, localized themselves in the relative way allowed 
> by the local self-referential correctness, apparently.
>
> Gödel's arithmetization of metamathematics  embed the mathematicians in 
> the arithmetical reality/truth/model (the structure (N, 0, +, x).
>
> Remarkably, incompleteness justfies the equivalence, at the truth level, 
> of all modes p, Bp, Bp & p, etc. , and the fact that the machine cannot 
> justify those equivalences, and that they obey quite different logics.
>
> Kant can be tested, by looking for time, space and the quantum "in the 
> head" of the universal machine. Apparently he is right.
>
> Bruno
>

*Translation: CMIIAW: Mumbo Jumbo  OR  There is a God. His name is Plato. 
He knows arithmetic. (Since he learned it from his father, we have an 
infinite regression of turtles within turtles.) AG *

>
>
>
>
>
>
> ​ John K Clark​
>
>
>  
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
> <javascript:>.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
>
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to