On Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 9:33:25 AM UTC-5, Terren Suydam wrote:
>
> If you're not bluffing, then what is holding you back from just holding 
> forth on your "very good model"? Just put it out there and let people 
> respond. That's how this thing works. You don't need an invitation. I doubt 
> it's all that relevant to this list, but that hasn't stopped people 
> before... it's not the first time this list has talked about 9/11. Bigfoot 
> might be a first though, at least as long as I've been here. But for the 
> love of pete, please stop dangling your ideas like bait. Nobody gives a 
> shit.
>

If they don't give a S, let them live in ignorance. AG 

>
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 8:49 AM, <agrays...@gmail.com <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 8:33:39 AM UTC-5, Terren Suydam wrote:
>>>
>>> Speaking for myself (and I'm guessing others) - I could care less. I 
>>> care enough to respond to this, but only because I find this style of 
>>> participation to be annoying as fuck. Nobody is going to take your bait. 
>>> I'm guessing you know that, so this amounts to a bluff. Put up or shut up.
>>>
>>
>> *And presumably it doesn't bother you in the slightest that Clark 
>> deliberately misrepresented my views, say of Big Foot, and shows an 
>> arrogant misunderstanding of how most conspiracy theories originate and 
>> evolve, which means he's woefully ignorant of history. None of this matters 
>> to you because you can't read well. Where were you educated? In Russia? 
>> Incidentally, I don't bluff. I have a very good model of the evident flash 
>> when in the CNN video when the second impact occurred at WTC1. It wasn't an 
>> incendiary device (implying a conspiracy). I wonder if any of the skeptics 
>> like Clark have a clue. AG *
>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>> *But, as I have shown, at least for 911, there IS an underlying logic, 
>>>> and the gurus here cannot debunk it even though they have given ample 
>>>> opportunity. I CAN debunk one of the major facts from which the conspiracy 
>>>> is constructed, but they're simply not interested. AG*
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>  
>>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to everything-li...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>> To post to this group, send email to everyth...@googlegroups.com 
>> <javascript:>.
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to