On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 11:29 AM Brent Meeker <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> On 12/11/2018 12:31 AM, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, December 10, 2018 at 7:05:17 PM UTC-6, Jason wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> No one is refuting the existence of matter, only the idea that matter is
>> primary.  That is, that matter is not derivative from something more
>> fundamental.
>>
>> Jason
>>
>
>
> I can understand an (immaterial) computationalism (e.g. *The universal
> numbers. From Biology to Physics.* Marchal B [
> https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26140993 ]) as providing a purely
> informational basis for (thinking of) matter and consciousness, but then
> why would *actual matter* need to come into existence at all? Actual
> matter itself would seem to be superfluous.
>
> If actual matter is not needed for experientiality (consciousness), and
> actual matter does no exist at all, then we live in a type of simulation of
> pure numericality. There would be no reason for actual matter to come into
> existence.
>
>
> If it feels like matter and it looks like matter and obeys the equations
> of matter how is it not "actual" matter?  Bruno's idea is that
> consciousness of matter and it's effects are all we can know about matter.
> So if the "simulation" that is simulating us, also simulates those
> conscious thoughts about matter then that's a "actual" as anything gets.
> Remember Bruno is a theologian so all this "simulation" is in the mind of
> God=arithmetic; and arithmetic/God is the ur-stuff.
>

It's not just Bruno who reached this conclusion. from Markus Muller's paper:

In particular, her observations do not fundamentally supervene on this
> “physical universe”; it is merely a useful tool to predict her future
> observations. Nonetheless, this universe will seem perfectly real to her,
> since its state is strongly correlated with her experiences. If the measure
> µ that is computed within her computational universe assigns probability
> close to one to the experience of hitting her head against a brick, then
> the corresponding experience of pain will probably render all abstract
> insights into the non-fundamental nature of that brick irrelevant.


Jason

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to