On Monday, January 14, 2019 at 5:22:16 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 13 Jan 2019, at 21:08, Philip Thrift <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
> wrote:
>
>
>
> My only link here is to my notebook:  
> https://codicalist.wordpress.com/contents/
> 102 notes so far. What I've though of is there somewhere.
>
>
> But in summary I adopt:
>
> - an *unconventional computationalism* (where psychical/experiential 
> modalities are entities of machine operation, vs. just logical/numerical 
> modalities)
>
>
> I can appreciate this. The universal number do appreciate this! The main 
> problem of the use of modal logic in philosophy is that there are too many 
> of them, but then with mechanism, we got a filter on them, and get the 
> imposed (by incompleteness) logics G and G* and their intensional variants, 
> which are very rich, and explains what there is a physical universe that we 
> can observe. Now, that physical universe loses its ontology, so we are back 
> to Plato (versus Aristotle’s materialism, for which there is no evidence at 
> all). 
>
>
>
>
> - a *PLTOS* (program-language-translator/compiler-object-substrate) 
> framework, where conventional PLT - programming language theory - is 
> extended to substrate-dependency, resulting in an (unconventional) UPLT
>
>
> How could a (universal) machine distinguish a substance from an oracle, or 
> from a more complex universal number? That seems as much impossible as to 
> be able to know that we are not dreaming. But we can know that we are 
> “dreaming", and nature confirms that position. “Dreaming” is in quote, 
> because it requires infinitely many brains/representation-in-arithmetic, 
> and is different from one specific dream made by one machine. The physics 
> comes from the first person statistical interference between those dreams.
>
> Bruno
>
>
>
>


I don't know if goo computers* can solve NP-hard  problems in linear time, 
or if psychical joins physical-informational in programming semantics of 
biocomputers, but we'll see ...


* https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/math/a25686417/amoeba-math/

- pt

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to